From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C7BFD5311 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:55:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=zQBPoqGuy+Nk3Y+axMWMHgErBPv1pT4vgLvjPkfdeB8=; b=NPZHfV8KsOaP9lvIn4wWdR+EEX 8viThqTRcWCmZA/3b/Zfs/5rWQWj85xKarWw7/W1vMyyiOQg0NiK2IbDUSsWpiwzheYyvZacZUoDk H7l/6gCPU0+IuUnZTKmOi/FD9zA7HbFEuHyJm/IZUl40R+AWr0DKeBkToJxWBNUYh+dJgttZIci/V z3i+VtM1Xd0l33hHmTarC8G2rtBQlNgAQAU+mhgZmcxKnjtP8ukp9aMUpztBPa4QqGhQGhnlATk/S O0N2QfCFSFwkAVfHTqX6SMNT8BPjwTXhmZXbiS4fjNtWILQk0Ovt6SZ9fd8YxyEingaR8uEhRYFp5 2w7T4mOw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vvtcp-000000082Ix-0X5X; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:55:07 +0000 Received: from zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33] helo=mail.zeus03.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vvtcm-000000082IK-1kRT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:55:05 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=zQBP oqGuy+Nk3Y+axMWMHgErBPv1pT4vgLvjPkfdeB8=; b=YiK3rVbvnQi5HCQx+CS8 YBNCLH3j2e3tWPs3BGg10CYQGHxHKGNHXMa/1TPBdLEFDMgqW5h0gFf2h8CUROKX rbX2vx3nYJ6vVGVvsS/WdbSo2ys1bOesFZj1OD6XIH8eBy+Qr3ff7kgB8/ZtwYaB A6Jb7bFsW3BUULyobXH9XsGVBZms9oSRl4Bz75gPLgGaksueHlrfy2k+OLYEnVCy wxqTqsv39VUL1TvYAwhgqxjC5M8GdIHSKQOGfv+Wyw1LCFHmq1Ohua+F0MIVazYF fMnbgTwlMRR/HB1KU1SABkh4vmX/1MH0P/Az+PNRzgD+7j9EcTvFqVwAO/+6mVmE ew== Received: (qmail 1407771 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2026 09:54:56 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 27 Feb 2026 09:54:56 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@7LYqZMpLnt0gAwDPXzF+ANZpdrMKUeLI Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:54:56 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Andi Shyti , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Khalil Blaiech , Asmaa Mnebhi , Jean Delvare , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] i2c: add and start using i2c_adapter-specific printk helpers Message-ID: References: <20260223-i2c-printk-helpers-v2-0-13b2a97762af@oss.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260227_005504_730152_83909D2A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > > I applied the series to for-current but squashed the user conversions > > into patch 1. Changes are trivial enough and I don't want the pull > > request to look excessive, so it can go in smoothly. Hope you are fine > > with it. > > > > Sure, do you still want me to send these changes in separate patches for > review? Yes, this is totally fine with me. I think we get more tags when the patches are broken out.