Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanshen Cao <alex.caoys@gmail.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: sunxi: Add support for A733 to Allwinner PCK600 driver
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 00:15:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aajLNxYvDrpT-qqC@c67c70be8272> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v64n_8RyWDieUKvbpkTikipB9ZvqEscYRRLowe+rvaJKCQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 10:33:23PM +0900, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 12:44 PM Yuanshen Cao <alex.caoys@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Allwinner A733 PCK600, similar to A523 PCK600, is likely a
> > customized version of ARM PCK-600 power controller. It shares
> > the same BSP driver with A523. According to the BSP provided
> > by Radxa, unlike A523, it doesn't require reset.
> >
> > Make reset optional in the sunxi pck600 driver and add support
> > for A733.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanshen Cao <alex.caoys@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pmdomain/sunxi/sun55i-pck600.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/sunxi/sun55i-pck600.c b/drivers/pmdomain/sunxi/sun55i-pck600.c
> > index c7ab51514531..8f9fdc3915bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pmdomain/sunxi/sun55i-pck600.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/sunxi/sun55i-pck600.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct sunxi_pck600_desc {
> >         u32 logic_power_switch0_delay;
> >         u32 logic_power_switch1_delay;
> >         u32 off2on_delay;
> > +       bool has_rst_clk;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct sunxi_pck600_pd {
> > @@ -151,9 +152,11 @@ static int sunxi_pck600_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >         if (IS_ERR(base))
> >                 return PTR_ERR(base);
> >
> > -       rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_released(dev, NULL);
> > -       if (IS_ERR(rst))
> > -               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rst), "failed to get reset control\n");
> > +       if (desc->has_rst_clk) {
> > +               rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_released(dev, NULL);
> > +               if (IS_ERR(rst))
> > +                       return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rst), "failed to get reset control\n");
> > +       }
> >
> >         clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
> >         if (IS_ERR(clk))
> > @@ -193,7 +196,14 @@ static int sunxi_pck600_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  }
> >
> >  static const char * const sun55i_a523_pck600_pd_names[] = {
> > -       "VE", "GPU", "VI", "VO0", "VO1", "DE", "NAND", "PCIE"
> > +       "VE",
> > +       "GPU",
> > +       "VI",
> > +       "VO0",
> > +       "VO1",
> > +       "DE",
> > +       "NAND",
> > +       "PCIE",
> 
> No need to change this part.
> 

Yes, I agree. But since A733 has more pd_names, that line will be too
long if we stick with one line. And we also used this format in
sun20i-ppu. It might make more sense if we align with ppu. Please let
me know what you think. Thanks!

> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct sunxi_pck600_desc sun55i_a523_pck600_desc = {
> > @@ -206,7 +216,36 @@ static const struct sunxi_pck600_desc sun55i_a523_pck600_desc = {
> >         .device_ctrl1_delay = 0xffff,
> >         .logic_power_switch0_delay = 0x8080808,
> >         .logic_power_switch1_delay = 0x808,
> > -       .off2on_delay = 0x8
> > +       .off2on_delay = 0x8,
> > +       .has_rst_clk = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const char * const sun60i_a733_pck600_pd_names[] = {
> > +       "VI",
> > +       "DE_SYS",
> > +       "VE_DEC",
> > +       "VE_ENC",
> > +       "NPU",
> > +       "GPU_TOP",
> > +       "GPU_CORE",
> > +       "PCIE",
> > +       "USB2",
> > +       "VO",
> > +       "VO1",
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct sunxi_pck600_desc sun60i_a733_pck600_desc = {
> > +       .pd_names = sun60i_a733_pck600_pd_names,
> > +       .num_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(sun60i_a733_pck600_pd_names),
> > +       .logic_power_switch0_delay_offset = 0xc00,
> > +       .logic_power_switch1_delay_offset = 0xc04,
> > +       .off2on_delay_offset = 0xc10,
> > +       .device_ctrl0_delay = 0x1f1f1f,
> > +       .device_ctrl1_delay = 0x1f1f,
> > +       .logic_power_switch0_delay = 0x8080808,
> > +       .logic_power_switch1_delay = 0x808,
> > +       .off2on_delay = 0x8,
> > +       .has_rst_clk = false,
> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct of_device_id sunxi_pck600_of_match[] = {
> > @@ -214,6 +253,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id sunxi_pck600_of_match[] = {
> >                 .compatible     = "allwinner,sun55i-a523-pck-600",
> >                 .data           = &sun55i_a523_pck600_desc,
> >         },
> > +       {
> > +               .compatible     = "allwinner,sun60i-a733-pck-600",
> > +               .data           = &sun60i_a733_pck600_desc,
> > +       },
> >         {}
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sunxi_pck600_of_match);
> >
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-05  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-04  3:43 [PATCH 0/2] allwinner: a733: Add A733 PCK600 Power Domain Controller Support Yuanshen Cao
2026-03-04  3:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: power: Add Support for Allwinner A733 PCK600 Power Domain Controller Yuanshen Cao
2026-03-04 11:36   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-04  3:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: sunxi: Add support for A733 to Allwinner PCK600 driver Yuanshen Cao
2026-03-04 13:33   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-03-05  0:15     ` Yuanshen Cao [this message]
2026-03-05  2:52       ` Chen-Yu Tsai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aajLNxYvDrpT-qqC@c67c70be8272 \
    --to=alex.caoys@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wens@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox