From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
To: "Viorel Suman (OSS)" <viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: imx-tpm: keep channel state instead of counting
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:29:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aalMdTmQd075dcF1@monoceros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202104738.837016-1-viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1656 bytes --]
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
> On a soft reset TPM PWM IP may preserve its internal state from
> previous runtime, therefore on a subsequent OS boot and driver
> probe "enable_count" value and TPM PWM IP internal channels
> "enabled" states may get unaligned. In consequence on a suspend/resume
> cycle the call "if (--tpm->enable_count == 0)" may lead to
> "enable_count" overflow the system being blocked from entering
> suspend due to:
>
> if (tpm->enable_count > 0)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> Fix the problem by replacing counting logic with per-channel state
> handling and by aligning IP and driver state at probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viorel Suman (OSS) <viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
I wonder if the following change would be enough:
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
index 5b399de16d60..36f873133f94 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int pwm_imx_tpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct clk *clk;
void __iomem *base;
int ret;
- unsigned int npwm;
+ unsigned int i, npwm;
u32 val;
base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
@@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static int pwm_imx_tpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mutex_init(&tpm->lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < npwm; ++i) {
+ val = readl(base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC(i));
+ if (FIELD_GET(PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS, val))
+ ++tpm->enable_count;
+ }
+
ret = devm_pwmchip_add(&pdev->dev, chip);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to add PWM chip\n");
Best regards
Uwe
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 10:47 [PATCH v2] pwm: imx-tpm: keep channel state instead of counting Viorel Suman (OSS)
2026-03-05 9:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2026-03-11 10:25 ` Viorel Suman (OSS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aalMdTmQd075dcF1@monoceros \
--to=ukleinek@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox