From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BB71093170 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 03:21:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=euot9GX9Psoi1WN6TxY1zgk1VpiBJA8QKwf2sKbBPeo=; b=Wyc1nH9SFiY7LZMS0Ify1egjvU vrD9PHeOpLwC6ASZRmu9NtHJhxruq1x2CmyPO6Q1JxaCfB1pjIan6Q1ns/F+XaPDrsELA4ly/j7ey WwFW1losUPhaAX2KTAYiKJ7oc1Zq5GLLYe0l7e6dm6xXG6tWP2EkR4InsJMBH4H4uGczNn+4Oj8WX 0jowL2qNfUzZBkYxIv6P46TXD1aElQ+cjZtp5x11vxOI3soz2GiO73m3naMoD2oeDpN69XoH9aKi/ iePqMrsK6fRjO38/qhixx99Ouahp6CyHRegXTqp+ncoTtQuZ0MWnwrdzq1rY3zxTIyf1wqCib7zJg GKCBcvTA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w3QQo-0000000C0Lj-1A2F; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 03:21:50 +0000 Received: from out30-110.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.110]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w3QQj-0000000C0Hr-0tLx; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 03:21:47 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1773976902; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=euot9GX9Psoi1WN6TxY1zgk1VpiBJA8QKwf2sKbBPeo=; b=xN8Iggt6tX/tPExA1iJqoRuwWlq1s3yfKPpziSg4l0nFJBV9Ftikd1T9GCqLLi9FN3blhNDRjK5G0CwGeNh+/JEEitgwYhuAjvqPkzn7GgRjCRaR2nYk+a8JP8XYZXyqz/Oqs1//4EapqRxUxu53ZDxLzntxy5IE2mxhfuafp8U= X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R471e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033037009110;MF=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=17;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0X.K7P-S_1773976899; Received: from 30.74.144.136(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0X.K7P-S_1773976899 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:21:40 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:21:39 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] change young flag check functions to return bool To: Andrew Morton Cc: david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, open , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260319201839.2dfa704041b8f13d8dbbfd3b@linux-foundation.org> From: Baolin Wang In-Reply-To: <20260319201839.2dfa704041b8f13d8dbbfd3b@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260319_202145_429078_A764F09F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.78 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 3/20/26 11:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:23:59 +0800 Baolin Wang wrote: > >> This is a cleanup patchset to change all young flag check functions to >> return bool, as discussed with David in the previous thread[1]. Since >> callers only care about whether the young flag was set, returning bool >> makes the intention clearer. No functional changes intended. > > One observation from Sashiko. Minorish, worth addressing: > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1773890510.git.baolin.wang%40linux.alibaba.com Yes, good catch. Will fix in next version. Thanks.