From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D72C30653 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:02:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=SuE4/09EOfcYLZeOfW93dKc0iN8jSuSTeATMX1Z/Rkw=; b=V6v1aOnt7DzHcS1rcqmK3yXWAc uOhrHrlwq8MlLwHEyE3nU062Pq8MwPHrcQE6Am7DzK03wNkOJwsWt83zTLAMAyBjzKNHQTZg9S3Ou +24VABKhq/Oue3EI6M/wGaYU3K7lFONdF/AxV93RVHqQXA6nEyi0Z3r6sHdWg97GB0bV2muD9xy7o LzJEPtsa2l+rWQ/ilj2QZ8X//ZOHD37fsXcFiCr15j3yoDoTLQXHVEvXUdNuS6xiBPo2SM9n2NABe RxdrgzTQ+JoxW4fNX4euXW9Lzfga3CY6rV8sG19LkqgmV+GxLDS9d9cdJ0ue4532Fv/2pFKvaWlOL vBZ4XVCQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sORuM-00000005EDe-3rKJ; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 01:02:10 +0000 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sORuB-00000005E8a-0NYB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 01:02:00 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.174]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WCl3Y1HKpznYQH; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:01:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.57]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA051400CD; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:01:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.109.254] (10.67.109.254) by kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:01:42 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:01:42 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Content-Language: en-US To: Kees Cook CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20240629085601.470241-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <202407010839.125126F@keescook> From: Jinjie Ruan In-Reply-To: <202407010839.125126F@keescook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.109.254] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.57) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240701_180159_341105_9B524DD2 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.26 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2024/7/1 23:40, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 04:55:58PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote: >> Changes in v3: >> - Test the MTE test cases. >> - Handle forget_syscall() in arch_post_report_syscall_entry() >> - Make the arch funcs not use __weak as Thomas suggested, so move >> the arch funcs to entry-common.h, and make arch_forget_syscall() folded >> in arch_post_report_syscall_entry() as suggested. >> - Move report_single_step() to thread_info.h for arm64 >> - Change __always_inline() to inline, add inline for the other arch funcs. >> - Remove unused signal.h for entry-common.h. >> - Add Suggested-by. >> - Update the commit message. > > I didn't see the mentioned feedback from tglx in any of the threads. Is > lore busted or is there discussion on this series happening somewhere > else? It Seems Thomas only sent it to me without a public email. >