From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
Cc: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate cmdq_batch on the heap
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:50:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abNDK/d/8CpLhcyb@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abMEybRcTskHOjd1@eric-acer>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 02:24:09AM +0800, Cheng-Yang Chou wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 02:22:50PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > IMO, if we really want to address these, instead of kmalloc, we could
> > potentially consider some pre-allocated per-CPU buffers (that's a lot of
> > additional book-keeping though) to keep the data off the stack or
> > something similar following a simple rule: The fast path must be
> > deterministic- no SLAB allocations and no introducing new failure points
> To resolve the stack warnings, I'm considering using per-CPU buffers in v2.
> Does this direction sound reasonable, or would you prefer to keep it as-is
> to avoid the added complexity?
I don't think per-CPU buffers would work here either..
arm_smmu_atc_inv_master() is used in a preemptible context, while
arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain() can be called from an irq context.
Think of a !SMP case for simplification: we only have one per-CPU
buffer, which is not enough if an IRQ preempts the task context.
Maybe having a smaller backup array on the stack that can be used
when the heap allocation fails? Still, I don't see how to address
it elegantly without losing some of the performance optimization.
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 9:44 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate cmdq_batch on the heap Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-03-11 14:22 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-12 18:24 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-03-12 22:50 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-03-13 0:06 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-17 13:38 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abNDK/d/8CpLhcyb@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox