public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
Cc: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate cmdq_batch on the heap
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:50:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abNDK/d/8CpLhcyb@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abMEybRcTskHOjd1@eric-acer>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 02:24:09AM +0800, Cheng-Yang Chou wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 02:22:50PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > IMO, if we really want to address these, instead of kmalloc, we could
> > potentially consider some pre-allocated per-CPU buffers (that's a lot of
> > additional book-keeping though) to keep the data off the stack or
> > something similar following a simple rule: The fast path must be 
> > deterministic- no SLAB allocations and no introducing new failure points

> To resolve the stack warnings, I'm considering using per-CPU buffers in v2. 
> Does this direction sound reasonable, or would you prefer to keep it as-is
> to avoid the added complexity?

I don't think per-CPU buffers would work here either..

arm_smmu_atc_inv_master() is used in a preemptible context, while
arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain() can be called from an irq context.

Think of a !SMP case for simplification: we only have one per-CPU
buffer, which is not enough if an IRQ preempts the task context.

Maybe having a smaller backup array on the stack that can be used
when the heap allocation fails? Still, I don't see how to address
it elegantly without losing some of the performance optimization.

Nicolin


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-12 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11  9:44 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate cmdq_batch on the heap Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-03-11 14:22 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-12 18:24   ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-03-12 22:50     ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-03-13  0:06       ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-17 13:38   ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abNDK/d/8CpLhcyb@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox