From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F55105F79C for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:35:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6UUBpcPvPMAWRYqT1JRM1Mjfzyj2T0c0/GqtAU3kekg=; b=xHCF8RcLrqHgmuR3aEY2UDuTOl Usks1qma38KHMjC8g/TZA44PauZbWRyuDNvUv1wsqqCmmAfswXOKhgKd/BYzUj4EWjm1a3GoToutU brk1ngydt5UIaXwLFO5orEU+J2OG6fN0BrKPxItNQ5IihjNV55WCzlCEyBmfOuyYNxR42+pefzXw/ 7H47N1GB3nWy6iX52thA+s0e/LQ54KFY2qo7naNIjEEqp2mq0/wW2Jm8OqHtm0wd3EHfM4gL4fTYd mep+Goon91shftE8+NrUyw1P4MA02ft0R+AknQDyQRoTR9azckWcWglBJYFp95sMi3Zj08Y9FhLpq J7fHPifA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w10nf-000000002Y8-0lky; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:35:27 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w10nY-000000002X0-05aF; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:35:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185B86183F; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E3B0C19421; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:35:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773401718; bh=6UUBpcPvPMAWRYqT1JRM1Mjfzyj2T0c0/GqtAU3kekg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=o6JNIl1MfZo9S0LPzeyR1gEJNG3JxCj/7FNZtIxtHQ/c0Pln/241h3TeIM0rcKeEs Qr4JPB8imfy4+s02TXe0/iMzV3geD63eEQXQUEfugyZuoYSU5SrKxc3ipDRV9Nxc71 MDkaopq+JvPWDzU5AYb5qnTPPh0GVeaHBH7yuuKYMCxYAlngD9rqWw4yX5LpFLi8Yv +tPO9Xbdl4yY0vV2p7YvMfYCu9bUM0P8bAk66FkSbwmjMHD/EJZicJhxmSvyPFEr9M qbwGNS+rcKCnBwOwQPru4ZZT50YABI/4tYzzwCNCV7uuFuA0aMvyytt7/M7RyFgCtS X0k8mFCwIO2vg== Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 12:35:16 +0100 From: Lorenzo Bianconi To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: select QDMA block according LAN/WAN configuration Message-ID: References: <20260310-airoha-qdma-lan-wan-mode-v1-1-64ec74dea872@kernel.org> <20260312172430.GA1267298@kernel.org> <20260312172248.68742f98@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MeKNmnGIFj0GyFIk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260312172248.68742f98@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --MeKNmnGIFj0GyFIk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 22:14:36 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > Is this a bug fix? > > > If so, perhaps it is for net with a fixes tag. =20 > >=20 > > I guess we do not need to target net tree since airoha_eth driver curre= ntly > > supports just the LAN interface via the MT7530 DSA switch connected to = GDM1 > > and there are no WAN interfaces officially supported (PCS/external phy = is not > > merged mainline yet, it is only available in OpenWrt). > >=20 > > >=20 > > > And at any rate, could you add some description of the before and aft= er > > > behaviour? =20 > >=20 > > Theoretically, before this patch, GDM ports were equally distributed be= tween > > QDMA0 and QDMA1 while this patch assigns LAN interfaces to QDMA0 and WAN > > interface to QDMA1. However, for the reason explained above, this chang= e is > > not currently visible to the user. >=20 > Please update the commit message. And please try harder to explain=20 > the patches, this happens a lot with your submissions.. ack, fine. Sorry for not beeing very clear about this (and other patches), I will pay more attention in the future. Do you think we should target net-next or net for this patch? Regards, Lorenzo --MeKNmnGIFj0GyFIk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQTquNwa3Txd3rGGn7Y6cBh0uS2trAUCabP2dAAKCRA6cBh0uS2t rE54AQC1mMaAyrYlZgokGGCJNLPOxAyImBcax4o0k8v1VJY9UwEA0dzu7dEQaV39 KehzNqgq9qHcA+qpmY3Zu8uwmj+WzAc= =9Tm6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MeKNmnGIFj0GyFIk--