From: jhugo@codeaurora.org (Jeffrey Hugo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] efi: fdt: avoid FDT manipulation after ExitBootServices()
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:08:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac1bad94-ffa3-4acf-a719-a8e8f4c7a283@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485971102-23330-2-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On 2/1/2017 10:45 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Some AArch64 UEFI implementations disable the MMU in ExitBootServices(),
> after which unaligned accesses to RAM are no longer supported.
>
> Commit abfb7b686a3e ("efi/libstub/arm*: Pass latest memory map to the
> kernel") fixed an issue in the memory map handling of the stub FDT code,
> but inadvertently created an issue with such firmwares, by moving some
> of the FDT manipulation to after the invocation of ExitBootServices().
> Given that the stub's libfdt implementation uses the ordinary, accelerated
> string functions, which rely on hardware handling of unaligned accesses,
> manipulating the FDT with the MMU off may result in alignment faults.
>
> So fix the situation by moving the update_fdt_memmap() call into the
> callback function invoked by efi_exit_boot_services() right before it
> calls the ExitBootServices() UEFI service (which is arguably a better
> place for it anyway)
>
> Note that disabling the MMU in ExitBootServices() is not compliant with
> the UEFI spec, and carries great risk due to the fact that switching from
> cached to uncached memory accesses halfway through compiler generated code
> (i.e., involving a stack) can never be done in a way that is architecturally
> safe.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: abfb7b686a3e ("efi/libstub/arm*: Pass latest memory map to the kernel")
> Tested-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
NACK, please. This causes a regression on my platform, in the form of
an assert in UEFI once ExitBootServices() is called, per initial
testing. I'll do more testing to determine why.
--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-01 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-01 17:45 [GIT PULL] EFI urgent fix for v4.10 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 17:45 ` [PATCH] efi: fdt: avoid FDT manipulation after ExitBootServices() Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 17:49 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-01 19:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-01 19:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 20:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-01 21:08 ` Jeffrey Hugo [this message]
2017-02-01 22:59 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-02-02 16:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-01 13:11 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 13:39 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-01 13:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 14:08 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-01 14:46 ` Riku Voipio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac1bad94-ffa3-4acf-a719-a8e8f4c7a283@codeaurora.org \
--to=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).