public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Prakash Gupta <prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu: Use pm_runtime in fault handlers
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 02:20:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac8j1jlFNxgZWzzK@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313-smmu-rpm-v2-1-8c2236b402b0@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 03:53:53PM +0530, Prakash Gupta wrote:
> Commit d4a44f0750bb ("iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime across the driver")
> enabled pm_runtime for the arm-smmu device. On systems where the SMMU
> sits in a power domain, all register accesses must be done while the
> device is runtime active to avoid unclocked register reads and
> potential NoC errors.
> 
> So far, this has not been an issue for most SMMU clients because
> stall-on-fault is enabled by default. While a translation fault is
> being handled, the SMMU stalls further translations for that context
> bank, so the fault handler would not race with a powered-down
> SMMU.
> 
> Adreno SMMU now disables stall-on-fault in the presence of fault
> storms to avoid saturating SMMU resources and hanging the GMU. With
> stall-on-fault disabled, the SMMU can generate faults while its power
> domain may no longer be enabled, which makes unclocked accesses to
> fault-status registers in the SMMU fault handlers possible.
> 
> Guard the context and global fault handlers with pm_runtime_get_if_active()
> and pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() so that all SMMU fault register accesses
> are done with the SMMU powered. In case pm_runtime is not active we can
> safely ignore the fault as for pm runtime resume the smmu device is
> reset and fault registers are cleared.
> 
> Fixes: b13044092c1e ("drm/msm: Temporarily disable stall-on-fault after a page fault")
> Co-developed-by: Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Brahma <pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prakash Gupta <prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Switched from arm_smmu_rpm_get()/arm_smmu_rpm_put() wrappers to
>   pm_runtime_get_if_active()/pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() APIs
> - Added support for smmu->impl->global_fault callback in global fault handler
> - Remove threaded irq context fault restriction to allow modifying stall
>   mode for adreno smmu
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260127-smmu-rpm-v1-1-2ef2f4c85305@oss.qualcomm.com
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index 5e690cf85ec9..f4c46491a03d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -462,10 +462,20 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>  	int idx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (!pm_runtime_get_if_active(smmu->dev))

Note that the pm_runtime_get_if_active(dev) only returns a positive
value if the device state is exactly RPM_ACTIVE. If the device is in the
middle of its runtime_suspend callback, its state is RPM_SUSPENDING.

Thus, if a fault races with the suspend callback, we'll return IRQ_NONE
and the suspend callback doesn't seem to be disabling interrupts.

This isn't any better if we're in a fault-storm caused by
level-triggered interrupts, we'd simply keep entering this handler and
return.

I believe we should clear / handle any pending faults/interrupts or
atleast mask interrupt in the suspend handler to avoid this situation.

> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +

Maybe we could add another wrapped-helper to maintain consistency:

static inline int arm_smmu_rpm_get_if_active(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
     if (!pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
         return 1; // Assume active/powered if RPM is not used
     return pm_runtime_get_if_active(smmu->dev);
}

This returns -EINVAL otherwise which isn't a problem for the if
condition but slightly cleaner.

> +	if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl->context_fault) {
> +		ret = smmu->impl->context_fault(irq, dev);
> +		goto out_power_off;
> +	}
> +

We've moved impl-specific handlers here, I don't see a functional change.
This looks fine.

>  	arm_smmu_read_context_fault_info(smmu, idx, &cfi);
>  
> -	if (!(cfi.fsr & ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_FAULT))
> -		return IRQ_NONE;
> +	if (!(cfi.fsr & ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_FAULT)) {
> +		ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +		goto out_power_off;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = report_iommu_fault(&smmu_domain->domain, NULL, cfi.iova,
>  		cfi.fsynr & ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_WNR ? IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE : IOMMU_FAULT_READ);
> @@ -480,7 +490,12 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>  				  ret == -EAGAIN ? 0 : ARM_SMMU_RESUME_TERMINATE);
>  	}
>  
> -	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +	ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> +out_power_off:
> +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(smmu->dev);

Nit: Please use arm_smmu_rpm_put() here.. while at it, I guess we can
also bring back pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() in arm_smmu_rpm_put() since
it is updated now to also mark last busy.

> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_global_fault(int irq, void *dev)
> @@ -489,14 +504,25 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_global_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
>  	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
>  				      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!pm_runtime_get_if_active(smmu->dev))
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> +

Same here.

> +	if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl->global_fault) {
> +		ret = smmu->impl->global_fault(irq, dev);
> +		goto out_power_off;
> +	}
>  
>  	gfsr = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR);
>  	gfsynr0 = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR0);
>  	gfsynr1 = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR1);
>  	gfsynr2 = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR2);
>  
> -	if (!gfsr)
> -		return IRQ_NONE;
> +	if (!gfsr) {
> +		ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +		goto out_power_off;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (__ratelimit(&rs)) {
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_DISABLE_BYPASS_BY_DEFAULT) &&
> @@ -513,7 +539,11 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_global_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	arm_smmu_gr0_write(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR, gfsr);
> -	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +	ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> +out_power_off:
> +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(smmu->dev);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_init_context_bank(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> @@ -683,7 +713,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  	enum io_pgtable_fmt fmt;
>  	struct iommu_domain *domain = &smmu_domain->domain;
>  	struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> -	irqreturn_t (*context_fault)(int irq, void *dev);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex);
>  	if (smmu_domain->smmu)
> @@ -850,19 +879,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  	 */
>  	irq = smmu->irqs[cfg->irptndx];
>  
> -	if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl->context_fault)
> -		context_fault = smmu->impl->context_fault;
> -	else
> -		context_fault = arm_smmu_context_fault;
> -
>  	if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl->context_fault_needs_threaded_irq)
>  		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq, NULL,
> -						context_fault,
> +						arm_smmu_context_fault,
>  						IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
>  						"arm-smmu-context-fault",
>  						smmu_domain);
>  	else
> -		ret = devm_request_irq(smmu->dev, irq, context_fault, IRQF_SHARED,
> +		ret = devm_request_irq(smmu->dev, irq, arm_smmu_context_fault, IRQF_SHARED,
>  				       "arm-smmu-context-fault", smmu_domain);
>  
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -2125,7 +2149,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	int num_irqs, i, err;
>  	u32 global_irqs, pmu_irqs;
> -	irqreturn_t (*global_fault)(int irq, void *dev);
>  
>  	smmu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*smmu), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!smmu) {
> @@ -2205,18 +2228,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (smmu->impl && smmu->impl->global_fault)
> -		global_fault = smmu->impl->global_fault;
> -	else
> -		global_fault = arm_smmu_global_fault;
> -
>  	for (i = 0; i < global_irqs; i++) {
>  		int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
>  
>  		if (irq < 0)
>  			return irq;
>  
> -		err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, global_fault, IRQF_SHARED,
> +		err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, arm_smmu_global_fault, IRQF_SHARED,
>  				       "arm-smmu global fault", smmu);
>  		if (err)
>  			return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
> 

Thanks,
Praan


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-03  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-13 10:23 [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu: Use pm_runtime in fault handlers Prakash Gupta
2026-04-03  2:20 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac8j1jlFNxgZWzzK@google.com \
    --to=praan@google.com \
    --cc=akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=cwabbott0@gmail.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakash.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=pratyush.brahma@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox