From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Ethan Luna <trunixcodes@zohomail.com>
Cc: peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com,
claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: i2c: atmel: fix block comment formatting
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:37:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acJph47mxNatFPC1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323134200.7766-1-trunixcodes@zohomail.com>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 06:40:49AM -0700, Ethan Luna wrote:
> Multiple block comments in tpm_i2c_atmel.c placed the closing '*/' on the
> same line as the comment text. This violates the kernel's preferred
> comment style, which requires the closing delimiter to appear on its
> line.
>
> Fix the formatting to improve readability and resolve checkpatch
> warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Luna <trunixcodes@zohomail.com>
> ---
>
> V1 -> V2: Fixed block comment formatting consistently across all multi-line comments
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260322193112.27010-1-trunixcodes@zohomail.com/
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c
> index 4f229656a8e2..c3cdc0d6e61c 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c
> @@ -31,9 +31,11 @@
>
> struct priv_data {
> size_t len;
> - /* This is the amount we read on the first try. 25 was chosen to fit a
> + /*
> + * This is the amount we read on the first try. 25 was chosen to fit a
> * fair number of read responses in the buffer so a 2nd retry can be
> - * avoided in small message cases. */
> + * avoided in small message cases.
> + */
> u8 buffer[sizeof(struct tpm_header) + 25];
> };
>
> @@ -58,7 +60,9 @@ static int i2c_atmel_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz,
> if (status < 0)
> return status;
>
> - /* The upper layer does not support incomplete sends. */
> + /*
> + * The upper layer does not support incomplete sends.
> + */
> if (status != len)
> return -E2BIG;
>
> @@ -76,9 +80,11 @@ static int i2c_atmel_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> if (priv->len == 0)
> return -EIO;
>
> - /* Get the message size from the message header, if we didn't get the
> + /*
> + * Get the message size from the message header, if we didn't get the
> * whole message in read_status then we need to re-read the
> - * message. */
> + * message.
> + */
> expected_len = be32_to_cpu(hdr->length);
> if (expected_len > count)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -111,15 +117,19 @@ static u8 i2c_atmel_read_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(chip->dev.parent);
> int rc;
>
> - /* The TPM fails the I2C read until it is ready, so we do the entire
> + /*
> + * The TPM fails the I2C read until it is ready, so we do the entire
> * transfer here and buffer it locally. This way the common code can
> - * properly handle the timeouts. */
> + * properly handle the timeouts.
> + */
> priv->len = 0;
> memset(priv->buffer, 0, sizeof(priv->buffer));
>
>
> - /* Once the TPM has completed the command the command remains readable
> - * until another command is issued. */
> + /*
> + * Once the TPM has completed the command the command remains readable
> + * until another command is issued.
> + */
> rc = i2c_master_recv(client, priv->buffer, sizeof(priv->buffer));
> dev_dbg(&chip->dev,
> "%s: sts=%d", __func__, rc);
> @@ -172,9 +182,11 @@ static int i2c_atmel_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> dev_set_drvdata(&chip->dev, priv);
>
> - /* There is no known way to probe for this device, and all version
> + /*
> + * There is no known way to probe for this device, and all version
> * information seems to be read via TPM commands. Thus we rely on the
> - * TPM startup process in the common code to detect the device. */
> + * TPM startup process in the common code to detect the device.
> + */
>
> return tpm_chip_register(chip);
> }
> --
> 2.53.0
>
Almost there but when I applied it I spotted some trailing whitespace
errors:
❯ scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -g HEAD
ERROR: trailing whitespace
#30: FILE: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c:34:
+^I/* $
ERROR: trailing whitespace
#55: FILE: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c:83:
+^I/* $
ERROR: trailing whitespace
#69: FILE: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c:120:
+^I/* $
ERROR: trailing whitespace
#81: FILE: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c:129:
+^I/* $
ERROR: trailing whitespace
#93: FILE: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c:185:
+^I/* $
total: 5 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 72 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
NOTE: Whitespace errors detected.
You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile
Commit fe31e9522c2c ("tpm: i2c: atmel: fix block comment formatting") has style problems, please review.
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
BR, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 13:40 [PATCH v2] tpm: i2c: atmel: fix block comment formatting Ethan Luna
2026-03-24 10:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acJph47mxNatFPC1@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=trunixcodes@zohomail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox