Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: vop2: Drop unused if_dclk_rate variable

From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Sandy Huang" <hjc@rock-chips.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: vop2: Drop unused if_dclk_rate variable
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:04:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acb52035-4f0c-430d-a2d2-26ab37805d7b@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5867171.29KlJPOoH8@diego>

Hi:

On 1/4/24 23:58, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Christian, Andy,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2024, 15:39:50 CET schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea:
>> Commit 5a028e8f062f ("drm/rockchip: vop2: Add support for rk3588")
>> introduced a variable which ended up being unused.  Remove it.
>>
>> rockchip_drm_vop2.c:1688:23: warning: variable ‘if_dclk_rate’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
> 
> in general, please don't send non-series patches as replies to other patches.
> It confuses tooling like b4 way too often, as this patch is not designated
> as a 2/2 (similar to the first one not being 1/2).
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c | 2 --
>>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>> index 44508c2dd614..923985d4161b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>> @@ -1685,7 +1685,6 @@ static unsigned long rk3588_calc_cru_cfg(struct vop2_video_port *vp, int id,
>>   	unsigned long dclk_core_rate = v_pixclk >> 2;
>>   	unsigned long dclk_rate = v_pixclk;
>>   	unsigned long dclk_out_rate;
>> -	unsigned long if_dclk_rate;
>>   	unsigned long if_pixclk_rate;
>>   	int K = 1;
>>   
>> @@ -1700,7 +1699,6 @@ static unsigned long rk3588_calc_cru_cfg(struct vop2_video_port *vp, int id,
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		if_pixclk_rate = (dclk_core_rate << 1) / K;
>> -		if_dclk_rate = dclk_core_rate / K;
>>   		/*
>>   		 * *if_pixclk_div = dclk_rate / if_pixclk_rate;
>>   		 * *if_dclk_div = dclk_rate / if_dclk_rate;
>>   		 */
> 		*if_pixclk_div = 2;
> 		*if_dclk_div = 4;
> 
> with the code continuing with those static constants but the comment
> showing a forumula, I do hope Andy can provide a bit of insight into
> what is happening here.
> 
> I.e. I'd really like to understand if that really is just a remnant or
> something different is needed.

This is not a remnant, in my V1, I calculate all the div by formula, but Sascha prefer
more for a constants value[0], so I keep this formula as comments to indicate how these value come from.

[0]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20231114112855.1771372-1-andyshrk@163.com/
> 
> 
> Heiko
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel