From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F2AC00523 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 03:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43897206F0 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 03:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="cXInRS8e" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 43897206F0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:References:To:Subject:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4lLYwQnVVQsm+jpf1KGxdFfR805qRt/vbxrIdelBwJ4=; b=cXInRS8efZANwH5QSI3V7iUjq LZTGdnl1l5tfcTiCLvr6uoYBmCNOFg86ehpDPnxo3BrVySxzfyua/J3W3WB78ANHi/jsWa9aMjsve NT4GzpNEfJzARspJP7EjxKoJal2Wby+xSX6DK3aBipvuAWOeECyci+vtg0haZ03FRn/gxzXt6+4FX EnR0lSVh8i2S+onom+kIsFDiTR6sVq9rdILhP6++IOJhuzMSm9YorBp4MYqF2BWNYjOuimxoL8Q2r 9UsLZZYHAVxYTRhpw5LXB/q8h2dACKhruRjtcfeM5eyQc50aiL6abm6sJZE3CjxDQqLcAhYydz82k 5Fc6yFhcA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ioIdA-00053D-Th; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 03:00:36 +0000 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ioId7-00052H-T4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 03:00:35 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 644158C70891016C964B; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:00:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.173.221.196) by DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:00:20 +0800 From: "liwei (GF)" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf tools: cs-etm: fix endless record after being terminated To: Leo Yan References: <20200102074144.10407-1-liwei391@huawei.com> <20200103082414.GB9814@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 11:00:19 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200103082414.GB9814@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------529A4C9796225E3A20E1E87B" X-Originating-IP: [10.173.221.196] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200105_190034_101671_1810A258 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, ilubashe@akamai.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, huawei.libin@huawei.com, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --------------529A4C9796225E3A20E1E87B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Leo, Thanks for your test and sorry for missing the reproducing info. The attachment is my test procedure, i can reproduce this issue with it on kernel 5.5-rc4 definitely. I have tested these patches on kernel 5.5-rc4, with intel-pt on Xeon Gold 6140 (72 cores) and arm-spe on HiSilicon Hi1620 (128 cores). But i can not test CoreSight temporarily, could you please test it with the test procedure again? P.s. Running the test procedure as a normal process is enough. Thanks٬ Wei On 2020/1/3 16:24, Leo Yan wrote: > > I took some time to test on Arm CoreSight, the perf program can be > terminated by Ctrl+c with SIGINT signal on the mainline kernel. > > And after capturing ftrace data with below log: > > 5242 migration/2-19 [002] d..3 4648.383155: sched_migrate_task: comm=perf pid=1692 prio=120 orig_cpu=2 dest_cpu=0 > 5243 migration/2-19 [002] d..2 4648.383167: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/2 prev_pid=19 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=swapper/2 next_pid=0 next_prio=120 > 5244 -0 [000] d..2 4648.383167: sched_switch: prev_comm=swapper/0 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=perf next_pid=1692 next_prio=120 > 5245 perf-1692 [000] d..2 4648.383193: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=1692 runtime=35420 [ns] vruntime=1636633943 [ns] > 5246 perf-1692 [000] d..3 4648.383200: sched_waking: comm=migration/0 pid=11 prio=0 target_cpu=000 > 5247 perf-1692 [000] dN.4 4648.383203: sched_wakeup: comm=migration/0 pid=11 prio=0 target_cpu=000 > 5248 perf-1692 [000] dN.2 4648.383205: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=1692 runtime=9340 [ns] vruntime=1636643283 [ns] > 5249 perf-1692 [000] d..2 4648.383208: sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=1692 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=migration/0 next_pid=11 next_prio=0 > 5250 migration/0-11 [000] d..3 4648.383215: sched_migrate_task: comm=perf pid=1692 prio=120 orig_cpu=0 dest_cpu=1 > 5251 algorithm1-721 [001] dN.2 4648.383225: sched_stat_runtime: comm=algorithm1 pid=721 runtime=2906000 [ns] vruntime=3501282256244 [ns] > 5252 algorithm1-721 [001] d..2 4648.383229: sched_switch: prev_comm=algorithm1 prev_pid=721 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=perf next_pid=1692 next_prio=120 > 5253 migration/0-11 [000] d..2 4648.383235: sched_switch: prev_comm=migration/0 prev_pid=11 prev_prio=0 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=swapper/0 next_pid=0 next_prio=120 > 5254 algorithm1-721 [001] d..4 4648.383241: > 5255 => kprobe_breakpoint_handler > 5256 => call_break_hook > 5257 => brk_handler > 5258 => do_debug_exception > 5259 => el1_sync_handler > 5260 => el1_sync > 5261 => etm_event_stop > 5262 => event_sched_out.isra.106 > 5263 => group_sched_out.part.108 > 5264 => ctx_sched_out > 5265 => task_ctx_sched_out > 5266 => __perf_event_task_sched_out > 5267 => __schedule > 5268 => schedule > 5269 => do_notify_resume > 5270 => work_pending > > We can see after send SIGINT signal, the process 'perf' will be > migrated from CPU2 to CPU0 (line 5242) and it will preempt process > 'algorithm1' (line 5252); after the process 'algorithm1' is scheduled > out, the function etm_event_stop() will be invoked to stop tracing. > > If we connect with the code in cs_etm_read_finish(), it tries to call > ioctl PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, but because the process 'algorithm1' is > scheduled out, so the perf event should not be enabled afterwards. > > I may miss something at here ... Could you confirm what's the type of > attached process? normal process or RT process? > > Thanks, > Leo > > P.s. I tested IntelPT with 5.2-rc3 kernel, it also can be terminated > properly. > >> return -EINVAL; >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> > > . > --------------529A4C9796225E3A20E1E87B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; name="perf_endless_record.c" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="perf_endless_record.c" #define _GNU_SOURCE #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include int num = 0; int test[65535]; int mess_rw(int data) { int i; while (1) { for (i = 0; i < (sizeof(test) / sizeof(test[0])); i++) { if (test[i] != data) test[i] = data; } } } void *test_thread(void *arg) { int cpu = *(int *)arg; cpu_set_t mask; CPU_ZERO(&mask); CPU_SET(cpu, &mask); if (!sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask)) printf("thread %d: running on cpu %d\n", cpu, cpu); else printf("thread %d: fail to set CPU affinity\n", cpu); mess_rw(cpu); return NULL; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { num = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF); pthread_t thread[num]; int id[num]; int i; printf("PID %d on system with %d processor(s)\n", getpid(), num); for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { id[i] = i; pthread_create(&thread[i], NULL, test_thread, (void *)&id[i]); } for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { pthread_join(thread[i], NULL); } return 0; } --------------529A4C9796225E3A20E1E87B Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --------------529A4C9796225E3A20E1E87B--