From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
sjakhade@cadence.com, thomas.richard@bootlin.com,
theo.lebrun@bootlin.com, robh@kernel.org
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, srk@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: cadence-torrent: add support for three or more links using 2 protocols
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:22:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acef4aeb-ddb6-4e2b-b2ac-8ac351efcf2f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240710115624.3232925-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Hi Siddharth,
On 10/07/2024 14:56, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> The Torrent SERDES can support at most two different protocols. This only
Could you please point to where this is mentioned? Doesn't this SERDES support 4 lanes?
So in theory each lane can be used as one protocol (or link) independed of the other.
Also, from code
struct cdns_torrent_phy {
...
struct cdns_torrent_inst phys[MAX_NUM_LANES];
...
}
and MAX_NUM_LANES is 4.
And from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-cadence-torrent.yaml
patternProperties:
'^phy@[0-3]$':
type: object
description:
Each group of PHY lanes with a single master lane should be represented as a sub-node.
Which means it can have upto 4 phy nodes with different protocols.
> mandates that the device-tree sub-nodes expressing the configuration should
> describe links with at-most two different protocols.
>
> The existing implementation however imposes an artificial constraint that
> allows only two links (device-tree sub-nodes). As long as at-most two
> protocols are chosen, using more than two links to describe them in an
> alternating configuration is still a valid configuration of the Torrent
> SERDES.
>
> A 3-Link 2-Protocol configuration of the 4-Lane SERDES can be:
> Lane 0 => Protocol 1 => Link 1
> Lane 1 => Protocol 1 => Link 1
> Lane 2 => Protocol 2 => Link 2
> Lane 3 => Protocol 1 => Link 3
>
> A 4-Link 2-Protocol configuration of the 4-Lane SERDES can be:
> Lane 0 => Protocol 1 => Link 1
> Lane 1 => Protocol 2 => Link 2
> Lane 2 => Protocol 1 => Link 3
> Lane 3 => Protocol 2 => Link 4
>
Could you please give an example of device tree where existing implementation
doesn't work for you.
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
> ---
>
> Hello,
>
> This patch is based on linux-next tagged next-20240710.
> Patch has been sanity tested and tested for functionality in the following
> configurations with the Torrent SERDES0 on J7200-EVM:
> 1. PCIe (Lanes 0 and 1) + QSGMII (Lane 2)
> => 2 protocols, 2 links
> 2. PCIe (Lane0 as 1 Link) + PCIe (Lane 1 as 1 Link)
> => 1 protocol, 2 links
> 3. PCIe (Lanes 0 and 1) + QSGMII (Lane 2) + PCIe (Lane 3)
> => 2 protocols, 3 links
>
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240709120703.2716397-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
> Changes since v1:
> - A multilink configuration doesn't necessarily imply two protocols
> since a single protocol may be split across links as follows:
> Lane 0 => Protocol 1
> Lane 1 => Unused
> Lane 2 => Protocol 1
> Lane 3 => Unused
> which corresponds to two links and therefore two sub-nodes. In such a
> case, treat it as two single-link configurations performed sequentially
> which happens to be the case prior to this patch. To address this,
> handle the case where cdns_torrent_phy_configure_multilink() can be
> invoked for a single protocol with multiple sub-nodes (links) by
> erroring out only when the number of protocols is strictly greater
> than two, followed by handling the configuration similar to how it was
> done prior to this patch.
--
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-10 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-10 11:56 [PATCH v2] phy: cadence-torrent: add support for three or more links using 2 protocols Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-07-10 15:22 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2024-07-11 5:13 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-07-11 7:54 ` Roger Quadros
2024-07-11 6:43 ` Swapnil Kashinath Jakhade
2024-07-11 7:53 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-07-11 8:04 ` Roger Quadros
2024-07-12 10:38 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-07-15 16:08 ` Roger Quadros
2024-07-16 4:04 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acef4aeb-ddb6-4e2b-b2ac-8ac351efcf2f@kernel.org \
--to=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=sjakhade@cadence.com \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).