From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Jeremy Linton" <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Guo Hui" <guohui@uniontech.com>,
Manoj.Iyer@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
"James Yang" <james.yang@arm.com>,
"Shiyou Huang" <shiyou.huang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: syscall: Direct PRNG kstack randomization
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 21:29:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acfc522a-5162-4b33-9d6c-1e25d0c44a71@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db7dfa2d-c7c6-4b10-981a-a7ecc87c8541@arm.com>
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, at 17:49, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 3/7/24 05:10, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand the logic. Do you mean that accessing
>> CNTVCT itself is slow, or that reseeding based on CNTVCT is slow
>> because of the overhead of reseeding?
>
> Slow, as in, its running at a much lower frequency than a cycle counter.
Ok, I see. Would it be possible to use PMEVCNTR0 instead?
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 22:18 [PATCH 0/1] Bring kstack randomized perf closer to unrandomized Jeremy Linton
2024-03-05 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/1] arm64: syscall: Direct PRNG kstack randomization Jeremy Linton
2024-03-05 23:33 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-06 20:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-06 21:54 ` Jeremy Linton
2024-03-07 11:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-07 19:10 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-07 21:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-07 19:15 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-07 22:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-08 16:49 ` Jeremy Linton
2024-03-08 20:29 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-03-22 23:40 ` Jeremy Linton
2024-03-23 12:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-07 19:05 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acfc522a-5162-4b33-9d6c-1e25d0c44a71@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=Manoj.Iyer@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=guohui@uniontech.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=james.yang@arm.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shiyou.huang@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox