From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: stmmac: TSO fixes/cleanups
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 19:51:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acl0pTqJ97o0PRxY@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260329111123.740bada9@kernel.org>
On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 11:11:23AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 21:36:21 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Hot off the press from reading various sources of dwmac information,
> > this series attempts to fix the buggy hacks that were previously
> > merged, and clean up the code handling this.
>
> We have a limit of 15 outstanding patches per tree.
> Please follow the community guidelines.
I see that restriction was newly introduced back in January.
> While I have you - you have a significantly negative "reviewer score".
> You post much more than you review. Which should earn you extra 24h
> of delay in our system. I've been trying to ignore that and prioritize
> applying your patches but it'd be great if you could review a bit more.
Sorry, but given the effort that stmmac is taking, I don't have much
capacity to extend mental cycles elsewhere.
This two patch series wouldn't have exploded into ten (or maybe even
more) patches had someone not pointed out the problem with
suspend/resume interacting with disabling TSO... which prompted me to
look deeper and discover a multitude of other problems. Should I
instead ignore these bugs and not bother trying to fix this stuff?
Honestly, I'm getting tired of stmmac with it sucking lots of my time,
and I suspect you're getting tired of the constant stream of patches
for it - but the reason there's a constant stream is because there's
so much that's wrong or broken in this driver.
So either we let the driver rot, or... what?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-29 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-28 21:36 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: stmmac: TSO fixes/cleanups Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:36 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net: stmmac: fix TSO support when some channels have TBS available Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-29 9:40 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-29 14:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-03-29 17:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-29 18:23 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:36 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: stmmac: add TSO check for header length Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:36 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net: stmmac: move TSO VLAN tag insertion to core code Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-29 9:09 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:36 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] net: stmmac: always enable channel TSO when supported Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:37 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] net: stmmac: fix .ndo_fix_features() Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:37 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: stmmac: simplify GSO/TSO test in stmmac_xmit() Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-29 9:17 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:37 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net: stmmac: split out gso features setup Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:37 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net: stmmac: make stmmac_set_gso_features() more readable Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:37 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net: stmmac: add warning when TSO is requested but unsupported Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-28 21:37 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: stmmac: move "TSO supported" message to stmmac_set_gso_features() Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-29 0:10 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: stmmac: TSO fixes/cleanups Russell King (Oracle)
2026-03-29 18:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-03-29 18:51 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acl0pTqJ97o0PRxY@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox