From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: pkvm: Rollback refcount on hyp share/unshare error
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 09:41:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acpCq1qZCMFqocs3@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324172757.2147153-1-vdonnefort@google.com>
Hey Vincent,
On Tuesday 24 Mar 2026 at 17:27:57 (+0000), Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> If one of the HVC __pkvm_host_share_hyp or __pkvm_host_unshare_hyp fails,
> rollback the refcount to ensure the hyp_shared_pfns tracking reflects
> the actual sharing status.
If any of these hypercalls fail I think we're still in trouble as
kvm_{un}share_hyp() work on multi-page ranges and we could leak pages in
a borked state if we fail halfway through. And failing any of these
hypercalls is also sign of a bigger problem somewhere else so I wasn't
too worried.
But if we're going to fix this properly, I'd suggest also improving the
error handling in kvm_share_hyp(). 'Fixing' kvm_unshare_hyp() is a bit
harder because we must tell the caller to leak the data structure that
was shared I presume, so maybe we just keep the WARN and cross our
fingers :)
Cheers,
Quentin
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 17d64a1e11e5..0fb41d2c8b44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -493,11 +493,17 @@ static int share_pfn_hyp(u64 pfn)
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> + ret = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_share_hyp, pfn);
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(this);
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> +
> this->pfn = pfn;
> this->count = 1;
> rb_link_node(&this->node, parent, node);
> rb_insert_color(&this->node, &hyp_shared_pfns);
> - ret = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_share_hyp, pfn);
> +
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&hyp_shared_pfns_lock);
>
> @@ -521,9 +527,15 @@ static int unshare_pfn_hyp(u64 pfn)
> if (this->count)
> goto unlock;
>
> + ret = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_unshare_hyp, pfn);
> + if (ret) {
> + this->count++;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> +
> rb_erase(&this->node, &hyp_shared_pfns);
> kfree(this);
> - ret = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_unshare_hyp, pfn);
> +
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&hyp_shared_pfns_lock);
>
>
> base-commit: c369299895a591d96745d6492d4888259b004a9e
> --
> 2.53.0.1018.g2bb0e51243-goog
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 17:27 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: pkvm: Rollback refcount on hyp share/unshare error Vincent Donnefort
2026-03-30 9:41 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acpCq1qZCMFqocs3@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox