On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 01:45:24PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/03/2026 17:10, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Hi ARM SoC maintainers,
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 6de23f81a5e08be8fbf5e8d7e9febc72a5b5f27f:
> > 
> >   Linux 7.0-rc1 (2026-02-22 13:18:59 -0800)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/tegra-for-7.1-arm64-dt
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to c70e6bc11d2008fbb19695394b69fd941ab39030:
> > 
> >   arm64: tegra: Add Tegra264 GPIO controllers (2026-03-28 01:36:46 +0100)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Thierry
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > arm64: tegra: Device tree changes for v7.1-rc1
> > 
> > Various fixes and new additions across a number of devices. GPIO and PCI
> > are enabled on Tegra264 and the Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit, allowing
> > it to boot via network and mass storage.
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Diogo Ivo (1):
> >       arm64: tegra: smaug: Enable SPI-NOR flash
> > 
> > Jon Hunter (1):
> >       arm64: tegra: Fix RTC aliases
> > 
> > Prathamesh Shete (1):
> >       arm64: tegra: Add Tegra264 GPIO controllers
> > 
> > Thierry Reding (6):
> >       dt-bindings: pci: Document the NVIDIA Tegra264 PCIe controller
> 
> 
> This is unreviewed/unacked binding where PCI maintainers had 1 day to
> react to your v3.

Rob gave a reviewed-by on this about a week ago:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/177440189257.2451552.18196101830235626115.robh@kernel.org/

In my experience the PCI maintainers typically defer review of the DT
bindings to DT maintainers, so I considered Rob's R-b sufficient.

>                   Maybe they had more time for previous versions, but
> nevertheless it is also part of other patchset, so it will get into the
> kernel other tree and nothing on v3 posting:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260326135855.2795149-4-thierry.reding@kernel.org/
> gives hints that there will be cross tree merge.

Maybe look at the cover letter:

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260326135855.2795149-1-thierry.reding@kernel.org/

I clearly pointed out the build dependencies and suggested a shared
branch to resolve them in both trees. Given that the bindings were
reviewed by Rob and they are needed in both the subsystem tree
(according to your own rules) as well as the DT tree (for validation),
I included the bindings in the shared branch as well.

Thierry