From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D951FD5F98 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 09:06:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To :Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=G3dDnw4IzrCfekJl10o0FujmE3xvC8fQS0cvzegUAX8=; b=lNddHbRatmdlZRkHfFTuH6bdS/ o1f0u9qoT2POS6gBJx2i4yWa31q4JfQyhTycoMhGTbcQlF/2WVRZ2pk6B/K1LF+JJeEoGDrR+Kh17 dH9B5+YhBRYGZTW+tIzl0YNaXyRSkL+ubQ+aCq/uwthHdib9mVsNxFGJcJpztOPGMIMo5nfwhgdsx N0Az1VK27NLjGmj8xqUrw0al6u4sdPXe1r2DdKvYx/9Ia2AA3D54+dHTw+rjabjDXUADCtX1JwnfP Sq5f0crU1ZTKVXWgsh5/N4bIQhpj8PHJpC7ME9VAwk6fUY1d2dVTQRbOFdBxNRvXg9JS3x+fYSbDq JRhceSHQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wAOrn-00000008Z6t-26wj; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 09:06:31 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wAOrl-00000008Z6I-26lS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 09:06:30 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1724E1516; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 02:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4122C3F641; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 02:06:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1775639187; bh=svANZbtAWMdqyJ33V6pOKrPbguC6VQewAGz+MZPH/ko=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RLE8XOyncR3PHPRtpXMvbagvrf4LxKJfwZFF8sTJu//FBTzvDPKfm327dzCnu2fw5 4seZjBi5+X5GjBv9M3hyfDDPQpG1QMBPEh7o6INxf4CMXwciXAD9+hKjHhKXq0zPt8 zH+HDrcy+sbxm0X8aN5lnvT+dWHKC+PK4Zuzm91Q= Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 10:06:23 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] arm64/entry: Message-ID: References: <20260407131650.3813777-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <87cy0a4gx7.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260408_020629_583854_A672070E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: vladimir.murzin@arm.com, Peter Zijlstra , ruanjinjie@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 10:02:28AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 11:08:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07 2026 at 14:16, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > I've split the series into a prefix of changes for generic irqentry, > > > followed by changes to the arm64 code. I'm hoping that we can queue the > > > generic irqentry patches onto a stable branch, or take those via arm64. > > > The patches are as follows: > > > > > > * Patches 1 and 2 are cleanup to the generic irqentry code. These have no > > > functional impact, and I think these can be taken regardless of the > > > rest of the series. > > > > > > * Patches 3 to 5 refactor the generic irqentry code as described above, > > > providing separate irqentry_{enter,exit}() functions and providing a > > > split form of irqentry_exit_to_kernel_mode() similar to what exists > > > for irqentry_exit_to_user_mode(). These patches alone should have no > > > functional impact. > > > > I looked through them and I can't find any problem with them. I queued > > them localy and added the missing kernel doc as I promised you on IRC. > > Thanks! Much appreciated! > > > As I have quite a conflict pending in the tip tree with other changes > > related to the generic entry code, I suggest that I queue 1-5, tag them > > for arm64 consumption and merge them into the conflicting branch to > > avoid trouble with pull request ordering and headaches for the -next > > people. > > > > Does that work for you? > > That sounds good to me. > > Catalin, Will, does that work for you? Yes, it does. Thanks! -- Catalin