From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB1FC43331 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CA3B20784 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="AK/fJNoP"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="gOwzDAgb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5CA3B20784 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=xmoU0VaHbUQLNvgaMUAfPXb4vUx6CT2C9zUMGfyXRyw=; b=AK/fJNoPPrPHw/efepXJJAvu0 4OixDFTAi2hlu4ZUuMF8C9X29P/y7fowedfVU2AEeOVXokREtjPJ8CxKhVII13XGXu9L4T2ZBaae9 xKyfqUM/LsroUigUcBwVHt/MpDWoiQBPgXAUzutPyQvr1WHqZ5gxXrGDkOzZe4gpxSbm9RcLZRcTl WcBXQ19lQ0WZDTc2ujzA4w/iF5R5fShyI/xOMmRk2qi2aBc3et5w0RQifCnP2nxkr8kwATvuA3BMV p1wcSbWmecqKK3OmQab21v/Rdw9B353o/zXM1MzHgUCRyiTPO451lstkTlt6TUcyFLiyfHo097EXu MdHD7VmCw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jJxfo-00049H-L6; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:06:12 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jJxfj-0003yV-CO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:06:09 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 032B5mRO043791; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 06:05:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585825548; bh=tIB72R51lzoNJX57UIZhH59wu8O+hq4911x6tWDtvvM=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gOwzDAgbuy6A3udlkBX8OS1lDFrDuI3qTrkUUUoUoc1Yt9GM0kjMrSICN2gv/wUlm N+ARrhZGUUrVkkiTymEvE3f/gQ0olYy2JhnxKFZhbQXKqGzmqCM1iDA1vOBRRtxLjN seH14/kjhBenKSX66yfQfWQXgz7tR2iWiqHLX0bM= Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (dlee114.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.25]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 032B5mcq096678; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 06:05:48 -0500 Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 06:05:48 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 06:05:47 -0500 Received: from [10.250.100.73] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 032B5fOW029504; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 06:05:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] net: ethernet: ti: add networking support for k3 am65x/j721e soc To: Will Deacon , Nick Desaulniers References: <20200401.113627.1377328159361906184.davem@davemloft.net> <20200401223500.224253-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20200402094239.GA3770@willie-the-truck> From: Grygorii Strashko Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:05:36 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200402094239.GA3770@willie-the-truck> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200402_040607_605376_C156EF99 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.10 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, robh@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kishon@ti.com, peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, m-karicheri2@ti.com, olof@lixom.net, kuba@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rogerq@ti.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 02/04/2020 12:42, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:35:00PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >>>> I think the ARM64 build is now also broken on Linus' master branch, >>>> after the net-next merge? I am not quite sure if the device tree >>>> patches were supposed to land in mainline the way they did. >>> >>> There's a fix in my net tree and it will go to Linus soon. >>> >>> There is no clear policy for dt change integration, and honestly >>> I try to deal with the situation on a case by case basis. >> >> Yep, mainline aarch64-linux-gnu- builds are totally hosed. DTC fails the build >> very early on: >> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/311246218 >> https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/311246270 >> There was no failure in -next, not sure how we skipped our canary in the coal >> mine. > > Yes, one of the things linux-next does a really good job at catching is > build breakage so it would've been nice to have seen this there rather > than end up with breakage in Linus' tree :( > > Was the timing just bad, or are we missing DT coverage or something else? It seems issue was not caught in -next because the patch that fixes the issue was already in -next before this series was pushed. Sorry for the mess again. -- Best regards, grygorii _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel