From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5377CC433EF for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 17:43:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=C247z2iQfObaBANb/6uVEvevNE5TCOZUKo5HSX0UeIw=; b=rioyBCRSpoKIbH hfM9KBa2mJyonCR3CV5KG4QXLL9QzYa5blntTVlux1hyPMyvLy2zMGyg828lnUsaWLcGp3R7cE2TE s7qU7QvFgCrPeF3FqPnJaAy6kS5zee+SPetEbuH+PUwIxAiP9dRdpD784sdAgP58ljs4VwQGY5LkK S4dSA/BlkRepHt4ZRSsm8jePLuIGm25Ndow2r8SYMhTAD4JXspErDUIE3/ozZdwQWP5x2hSuwHwjV ZV0x/o4pa8+/m77MVFOwXdDvy7Gb8juDcMget4mmHe9HGO2ciXAwPPUnix1b4EV7B1EOAhzfhJetS jdJMM/x+MckKIPfYHa/Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ndba8-005DnB-N0; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 17:42:36 +0000 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ndba6-005Dma-77 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 17:42:35 +0000 Received: from [192.168.254.32] (unknown [47.189.24.195]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DB332056575; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 10:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 7DB332056575 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1649612553; bh=3LIaI8e8C70YkUnBbwkMYjrPWtTThOHY/RD2wXNSCVk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=nL2PGnfIpVgZIQtY6cH+mXMHCIZCtD/ia+cbHN119O3ylrWHyfPfnXC/vA/qb7CLR SpN01E/V1RFC5G0AHP72LVtn3lear0WNrXOH1rHcM1tntWSXhFRVZZJF5kgiGzN0UH vv7kWnW2SgYseBmm9OuDBtBBi0VpHnkjhpbzK0mM= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 12:42:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind() Content-Language: en-US To: Mark Rutland Cc: broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f> <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20220117145608.6781-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <845e4589-97d9-5371-3a0e-f6e05919f32d@linux.microsoft.com> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220410_104234_326539_18F495F9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.20 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 4/8/22 12:58, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:44:34PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:51:38AM -0600, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: >>> Hey Mark Rutland, Mark Brown, >>> >>> Could you please review the rest of the patches in the series when you can? >> >> Sorry, I was expecting a new version with some of my comments >> addressed, in case that had effects on subsequent patches. >> >>> Also, many of the patches have received a Reviewed-By from you both. >>> So, after I send the next version out, can we upstream those ones? >> >> I would very much like to upstream the ones I have given a Reviewed-by. >> >> Given those were conditional on some adjustments (e.g. actually filling >> out comments), do you mind if I pick those into a series now? > > FWIW, I've picked up the set I'm trivially happy with, rebased that on > v5.18-rc1, and put that on a branch with a couple of other cleanups: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/stacktrace/cleanups > > I'll send that out on Monday if there are no objections. > > Thanks, > Mark. LGTM. Madhavan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel