From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BF4F44847 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:13:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=W0BvSXReYSRRwgUShrYlU35UKMeEmkue4ENtTgSs2TQ=; b=LnMUQzMLIOvflvdRDwzPXHVBPJ y8uG0ZOm3yKNto0ysMdasmM/Ek9wP5DD6rI+239jp0k+twXsZrWWzDjzKFcuRIKmxGfAe7lKcieRU joea4EQJKRkpAUAHU4L18Wz+6sBwmrhi6UpFERyCiFRL/zEngN4oPqbPqKHYLFGlY1Sr1u4GcQymJ bJQ3j8j0fWVSd199Qse9ScaoZchlgItwhe/KKhgqjtMRkNvqmQ58fBEUJ2Cnd2v9hup7bylkBNqXs ssvM0TgVwaNmptPmCXtuR66oFffOPJ8pgyPWYPrmEsPmyKnF940KH8nFS3oymWS98N3aqeZloT03a H0vJJp8Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wBAkE-0000000C8Od-1sS5; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:13:54 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wBAkC-0000000C8OX-1MF7 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:13:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AB96024D; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 945D6C19421; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:13:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1775823231; bh=Mr9yxOrAKcnkKOYz0gBol4ytGWhmvk0ZGMLSGWC88UA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tLzPZ7sleIRkgRUbRXWJDZwu1lql5NkDTsfvi2l3sWZDBGqnMUC2nUk1cHxoBxMms ULDJrUVTDHlAlvO4n4FTXnygk1oB0t7mC27YH2+j4No4IUzJiDsOhxw/ZGMhp3hMiR Rb8doK3idFBNSpQ4O2TMorkL/hJ4kVEGTS+3/iyOkqsJsKSL9TLtn8ihSbHVjAIBWN lL7SOh7tk79CxmERhjRi2vxcjvOUErXbhEh2C8uiy9umOXz1xoR4jYSL2+psJkS5fo G+pL7nyUzc4fZfkE9V5r6FA45of6iVKUaFTxQRjFjWRxSQ9GinlVMdY0TNMf1f81VN RCSjyXxfG69wA== Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:13:40 +0100 From: Lorenzo Stoakes To: Usama Arif Cc: Andrew Morton , david@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, r@hev.cc, jack@suse.cz, ajd@linux.ibm.com, apopple@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, brauner@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, kees@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, npache@redhat.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, rmclure@linux.ibm.com, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, Al Viro , ziy@nvidia.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kas@kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, leitao@debian.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: improve large folio readahead and alignment for exec memory Message-ID: References: <20260402181326.3107102-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> <803a0c15-0a6a-4c00-b6b3-eaae56d5fc15@linux.dev> <262a41db-a425-4362-bb67-df61119625d5@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <262a41db-a425-4362-bb67-df61119625d5@linux.dev> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 01:05:40PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote: > > > On 10/04/2026 12:55, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 12:03:03PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 02/04/2026 19:08, Usama Arif wrote: > >>> v2 -> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260320140315.979307-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/ > >>> - Take into account READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS for elf alignment by aligning > >>> to HPAGE_PMD_SIZE limited to 2M (Rui) > >>> - Reviewed-by tags for patch 1 from Kiryl and Jan > >>> - Remove preferred_exec_order() (Jan) > >>> - Change ra->order to HPAGE_PMD_ORDER if vma_pages(vma) >= HPAGE_PMD_NR > >>> otherwise use exec_folio_order() with gfp &= ~__GFP_RECLAIM for > >>> do_sync_mmap_readahead(). > >>> - Change exec_folio_order() to return 2M (cont-pte size) for 64K base > >>> page size for arm64. > >>> - remove bprm->file NULL check (Matthew) > >>> - Change filp to file (Matthew) > >>> - Improve checking of p_vaddr and p_vaddr (Rui and Matthew) > >>> > >> > >> Hello! > >> > >> Just wanted to check if there was any feedback/review on the latest > >> revision? > > > > It's -rc7, this is definitely something for next cycle :) > > > > Yeah no worries! Just wanted to check what people thought about it! We'll come back to it! With LSF coming too I think people are fairly distracted as well. > > > On my part, my upstream bandwidth has drastically reduced, and review is > > probably going to have to be a hobbyist thing at least for now. > > > > Also, not to be mean but: > > > > $ git log -E -i --grep "(Reviewed|Acked)-by: Usama Arif" --oneline | wc -l > > 21 > > > > So... :) > > > > Review in mm is very lop-sided, let's try to balance it out a bit! > > > > Ah yeah actually I have been reviewing a lot over the last few months. Good :) > I dont ack patches that have already been acked-by/reviewed-by maintainers. You should do that, it is meaningful. If you think a patch is OK, it's how you say so! Maintainers get things wrong too by the way, assume we are wrong and try to find issues, this is how a healthy technical community operates (as long as everybody is civil about it :) > as I am not sure if it adds anything. I never really cared about Reviewed/Acked > by/patch count but I can start adding tags if it helps in stats. It's the only metric I can quickly bring up, so sorry that in this case I got it wrong, but the overall point remains the same - we want to see a balance of review and contributions, right now the two are really very lopsided! > > The reviews I have done over the last week alone: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260408122307.1360475-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260408123700.1596800-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260409142256.131676-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260410114809.3592720-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260410112433.3248586-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260331103451.1070175-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/T/#t > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260401152343.3294686-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/ > > > > > Cheers, Lorenzo