From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
mike.leach@arm.com, james.clark@linaro.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, leo.yan@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] coresight: etm4x: exclude ss_status from drvdata->config
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 16:48:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adu+uu3CFSbPMaFT@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8d11f92-2af8-46e7-9098-18a835c6ec8a@oss.qualcomm.com>
Hi Jie,
>
>
> On 4/10/2026 3:43 PM, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > The purpose of TRCSSCSRn register is to show status of
> > the corresponding Single-shot Comparator Control and input supports.
> > That means writable field's purpose for reset or restore from idle status
> > not for configuration.
> >
> > Therefore, exclude ss_status from drvdata->config, move it to etm4x_caps.
> > This includes remove TRCSSCRn from configurable item and
> > remove saving in etm4_disable_hw().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> > ---
> > .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c | 1 -
> > .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 18 +++++-------------
> > .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c | 7 ++-----
> > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h | 3 ++-
> > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
> > index c302072b293a..d14d7c8a23e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-cfg.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static int etm4_cfg_map_reg_offset(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
> > off_mask = (offset & GENMASK(11, 5));
> > do {
> > CHECKREGIDX(TRCSSCCRn(0), ss_ctrl, idx, off_mask);
> > - CHECKREGIDX(TRCSSCSRn(0), ss_status, idx, off_mask);
> > CHECKREGIDX(TRCSSPCICRn(0), ss_pe_cmp, idx, off_mask);
> > } while (0);
> > } else if ((offset >= TRCCIDCVRn(0)) && (offset <= TRCVMIDCVRn(7))) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> > index 6443f3717b37..b7abb171f523 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static bool etm4x_sspcicrn_present(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata, int n)
> > const struct etmv4_caps *caps = &drvdata->caps;
> > return (n < caps->nr_ss_cmp) && caps->nr_pe &&
> > - (drvdata->config.ss_status[n] & TRCSSCSRn_PC);
> > + (caps->ss_status[n] & TRCSSCSRn_PC);
> > }
> > u64 etm4x_sysreg_read(u32 offset, bool _relaxed, bool _64bit)
> > @@ -571,11 +571,9 @@ static int etm4_enable_hw(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, config->res_ctrl[i], TRCRSCTLRn(i));
> > for (i = 0; i < caps->nr_ss_cmp; i++) {
> > - /* always clear status bit on restart if using single-shot */
> > - if (config->ss_ctrl[i] || config->ss_pe_cmp[i])
> > - config->ss_status[i] &= ~TRCSSCSRn_STATUS;
> > etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, config->ss_ctrl[i], TRCSSCCRn(i));
> > - etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, config->ss_status[i], TRCSSCSRn(i));
> > + /* always clear status bit on restart if using single-shot */
>
> the clear step for the status bit has been removed. but the comment still
> here.
>
> I think we cannot remove the clear step. The hardware requires the STATUS
> bit to be cleared before re-arming a single-shot comparator; failing to do
> so means the comparator will not fire on the next trace session
This one is intended. if you see the patch:
+ /* always clear status bit on restart if using single-shot */
+ etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, caps->ss_status[i], TRCSSCSRn(i));
cap->ss_status[i] is initialised by etm4_init_arch_data() cleared
STATUS & PENDING bit. so the comment is still valid.
Thanks.
[...]
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-12 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 7:43 [PATCH v2 0/5] fix inconsistencies with sysfs configuration in etmX Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] coresight: etm4x: introduce struct etm4_caps Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-12 14:35 ` Jie Gan
2026-04-12 15:51 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] coresight: etm4x: exclude ss_status from drvdata->config Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-12 14:40 ` Jie Gan
2026-04-12 15:48 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2026-04-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] coresight: etm4x: fix inconsistencies with sysfs configration Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] coresight: etm3x: introduce struct etm_caps Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-12 14:21 ` Jie Gan
2026-04-12 14:24 ` Jie Gan
2026-04-12 15:43 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-10 7:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] coresight: etm3x: fix inconsistencies with sysfs configration Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adu+uu3CFSbPMaFT@e129823.arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox