From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnaud.pouliquen@st.com (Arnaud Pouliquen) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 14:20:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v8 15/18] ARM: STi: DT: STiH407: Add uniperif reader dt nodes In-Reply-To: <20160831112819.GJ27357@dell> References: <1472223413-7254-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1472223413-7254-16-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <20160830100148.GO1661@dell> <20160830142112.GA22514@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> <20160831112819.GJ27357@dell> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello ptere, Lee, Thanks for your remarks, Regards Arnaud On 08/31/2016 01:28 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Peter Griffin wrote: >> Thanks for reviewing and your very valuable feedback. >> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Peter Griffin wrote: >>> >>>> This patch adds the DT node for the uniperif reader >>>> IP block found on STiH407 family silicon. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi >>>> index d263c96..bdddf2c 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi >>>> @@ -956,5 +956,31 @@ >>>> st,version = <5>; >>>> st,mode = "SPDIF"; >>>> }; >>>> + >>>> + sti_uni_reader0: sti-uni-reader at 0 { >>>> + compatible = "st,sti-uni-reader"; >>>> + status = "disabled"; >>> >>> I find it's normally nicer to place the status of the node at the >>> bottom, separated by a '\n'. >> >> Ok I'll add a superflous '\n' in the next version. > > Everyone loves a smart arse! > > In this case I believe the '\n' to be a functional separator and not > superfluous at all. > >>>> + dai-name = "Uni Reader #0 (PCM IN)"; >>> >>> Oooo, not seen something like this before. >>> >>> If it does not already have one, it would require a DT Ack. >> >> No idea, the driver got merged 1 year ago. This field could be suppressed and handled in source code, using st,uniperiph-id to retreive it. >> >> Arnaud did you get a DT ack when you merged this driver & binding? i if i remember well, i had sent to Alsa mailing list only, I missed this obvious... >>> >>>> + st,version = <3>; >>> >>> This will likely need a DT Ack too. We usually encode this sort of >>> information in the compatible string. yes, better to use compatibility >> >> See 05c1b4480e86a871b18030d6f3d532dc0ecdf38c > > Well Rob's the boss. We certainly never used to take 'device ID' or > 'version' attributes. I guess something must have changed. I will try to provide patches for code and bindings rework this week.