From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01815CCF9F0 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Reply-To:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=YoSq++nMszGY9bt29LBL0PZ1p8tLUB3QcUk9v8Tevok=; b=u5kBdzbGzdxXQp Ghr1lzk6EHe0cFkYLCi5P0Q+mEiuJ6j6AOBXuDSlPbAgM/uFqLD/QErppm4p8d7ofAuYM+CQrJasH muhgmyBU1XwdrNVAwbybhOOW1MPcAOoDaHDGxCi82IE3aNi/tuEFi/4V/Na1DX8kKbfd1CT1kdlQc rLozJXsVVQuYFpIn2MiLHxFuO96Pa/bhjWqBZ2S9kbokeze7KNERcfxURio7Eb1AUv1L/BjJ8dX2e Li+gMJi6nveKOdoXexRtNhE/uG52kdp7apxvoqr81oH6uBuNkk8ZWKdbqDCVhlgReVdBL6fBj9tlk Lno6PSObL6fh0JTWkYtg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vEPhg-00000003xJl-318X; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:24 +0000 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vEPhe-00000003xJE-3Jbl for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:24 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0356516.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 59TNrekC025857; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:17 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=YoSq++nMszGY9bt29LBL0PZ1p8tLUB3QcUk9v8Tevok=; b=lS/J3iOZUqdw xjtisU2ThKSfJuqjhqAJq+T6WakwcMIwHRZaRiKrX/BEJCbEYrwhnVLIbynjYFup kccbZ5PqbTAcOfbGoF3pB048WWZqzMbNbB+ixyLPP/aeQv5oMjcF9GOacdhomTHB 7R9xqbkAWawhoCWaVVdJymcvmflEryL3mnk+KxCK49KpfPs6Zoq5WxUmJfjkhWH3 YhBDvCWIz2xwUzucIG5JtT6fqLgM9a+ONdeG2snUOKiz8eN5/cwz0JBychXUwljk T9qAEEc6S8tS9hYFa5Jq5ofsteq/J1yYm6FPSgyznEkls81JvZCHZ23AiE+5F/Jk HgHORyw02Q== Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a34aaqj4w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 59U9ZAL2031682; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:17 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.68]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a33w0851w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:17 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.102]) by smtprelay01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 59UAGGRD49938778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:16 GMT Received: from smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7E25803F; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD3E5805A; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltc.linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.5.196.140]) by smtpav03.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:16:15 +0000 (GMT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 11:16:15 +0100 From: Harald Freudenberger To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Ard Biesheuvel , "Jason A . Donenfeld" , Holger Dengler , Herbert Xu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] SHA-3 library Mail-Reply-To: freude@linux.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20251029203345.GA3750798@google.com> References: <20251026055032.1413733-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20251029163216.GA1603@sol> <20251029203345.GA3750798@google.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: freude@linux.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=ALkgKXG8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=69033af1 cx=c_pps a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:117 a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=x6icFKpwvdMA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=0r5XAF8DqmaS_OcKmuIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=cPQSjfK2_nFv0Q5t_7PE:22 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: oP_21WzJILOfDfjLU50L0OlXP7MaxWvL X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMDI4MDE2NiBTYWx0ZWRfX4dUULRhVnU1x 1FOVGJlnMw0vaiqnv7D4t705UMKnCzlabHzk/wl1Z7nc9Wr/G4ezmLHLY3fC4g3AzMfxrpBF0ro WDNS2z3dDytelCZ976WddeLufMjSDBikGYHlikPvMF91xhmTBWd3zV5dXhw+usM68iWUY7CWoCU MzV7gMdAM0Mg7BBBcgprbbqDIf5ernyCWzaqVKI9m7IHgeQBhEgVKMdfcqXNGKixEgxn4UBwdCt VU+Yeip1mLnIzjHAK05b5nZBqFSGy/pO0FDJXWvaTCmydZdWRzcghaD4qE3glgHZRWjYWx7EKsq hohMmmnx2bPtTQviCES0VxCy1yDNciMWZGpqSoiOB2Yo4WhRU84UgxiX3k4Kq2gS+iKktWfbF90 0nZt6Th4CtUHz0oKVGkzQpIFjyYboQ== X-Proofpoint-GUID: oP_21WzJILOfDfjLU50L0OlXP7MaxWvL X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2025-10-30_02,2025-10-29_03,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510240000 definitions=main-2510280166 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251030_031622_955491_9C0D9C53 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: freude@linux.ibm.com Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2025-10-29 21:33, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 09:32:16AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Harald Freudenberger wrote: >> > > If the s390 folks could re-test the s390 optimized SHA-3 code (by >> > > enabling CRYPTO_LIB_SHA3_KUNIT_TEST and CRYPTO_LIB_BENCHMARK), that >> > > would be helpful. QEMU doesn't support the instructions it uses. Also, >> > > it would be helpful to provide the benchmark output from just before >> > > "lib/crypto: s390/sha3: Add optimized Keccak function", just after it, >> > > and after "lib/crypto: s390/sha3: Add optimized one-shot SHA-3 digest >> > > functions". Then we can verify that each change is useful. >> [...] >> > >> > Picked this series from your ebiggers repo branch sha3-lib-v2. >> > Build on s390 runs without any complains, no warnings. >> > As recommended I enabled the KUNIT option and also CRYPTO_SELFTESTS_FULL. >> > With an "modprobe tcrypt" I enforced to run the selftests >> > and in parallel I checked that the s390 specific CPACF instructions >> > are really used (can be done with the pai command and check for >> > the KIMD_SHA3_* counters). Also ran some AF-alg tests to verify >> > all the the sha3 hashes and check for thread safety. >> > All this ran without any findings. However there are NO performance >> > related tests involved. >> >> Thanks! Just to confirm, did you actually run the sha3 KUnit test and >> verify that all its test cases passed? That's the most important one. >> It also includes a benchmark, if CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_BENCHMARK=y is >> enabled, and I was hoping to see your results from that after each >> change. The results get printed to the kernel log when the test runs. >> > > Also, can you confirm that you ran the test on a CPU that has > "facility 86", so that the one-shot digest functions get exercised? > > (By the way, I recommend defining named constants somewhere in > arch/s390/ for the different facilities. I borrowed the > "test_facility(86)" from the existing code, which does not say what 86 > means. After doing some research, it looks like it means MSA12.) > Of course, the machine I used has MSA level 12 (stfle bit 86). > - Eric