Hello Dmitry, On 2026-04-23T07:53:55+0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2026 at 03:48, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > > > > On 4/23/2026 3:47 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 22 2026 at 19:11, Mark Rutland wrote: > > >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 07:49:30PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > >> Conceptually we just need to use syscall_enter_from_user_mode() and > > >> irqentry_enter_from_user_mode() appropriately. > > > > > > Right. I figured that out. > > > > > >> In practice, I can't use those as-is without introducing the exception > > >> masking problems I just fixed up for irqentry_enter_from_kernel_mode(), > > >> so I'll need to do some similar refactoring first. > > > > > > See below. > > > > > >> I haven't paged everything in yet, so just to cehck, is there anything > > >> that would behave incorrectly if current->rseq.event.user_irq were set > > >> for syscall entry? IIUC it means we'll effectively do the slow path, and > > >> I was wondering if that might be acceptable as a one-line bodge for > > >> stable. > > > > > > It might work, but it's trivial enough to avoid that. See below. That on > > > top of 6.19.y makes the selftests pass too. > > > > This aligns with my thoughts when convert arm64 to generic syscall > > entry. Currently, the arm64 entry code does not distinguish between IRQ > > and syscall entries. It fails to call rseq_note_user_irq_entry() for IRQ > > entries as the generic entry framework does, because arm64 uses > > enter_from_user_mode() exclusively instead of > > irqentry_enter_from_user_mode(). > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260320102620.1336796-10-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/ > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > tglx > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c > > > @@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ static void noinstr exit_to_kernel_mode( > > > irqentry_exit(regs, state); > > > } > > > > > > +static __always_inline void arm64_enter_from_user_mode_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs) > > > +{ > > > + enter_from_user_mode(regs); > > > + mte_disable_tco_entry(current); > > > +} > > > + > > > /* > > > * Handle IRQ/context state management when entering from user mode. > > > * Before this function is called it is not safe to call regular kernel code, > > > @@ -65,8 +71,8 @@ static void noinstr exit_to_kernel_mode( > > > */ > > > static __always_inline void arm64_enter_from_user_mode(struct pt_regs *regs) > > > { > > > - enter_from_user_mode(regs); > > > - mte_disable_tco_entry(current); > > > + arm64_enter_from_user_mode_syscall(regs); > > > + rseq_note_user_irq_entry(); > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > @@ -717,7 +723,7 @@ static void noinstr el0_brk64(struct pt_ > > > > > > static void noinstr el0_svc(struct pt_regs *regs) > > > { > > > - arm64_enter_from_user_mode(regs); > > > + arm64_enter_from_user_mode_syscall(regs); > > > cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_svc_handler(); > > > fpsimd_syscall_enter(); > > > local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX); > > > @@ -869,7 +875,7 @@ static void noinstr el0_cp15(struct pt_r > > > > > > static void noinstr el0_svc_compat(struct pt_regs *regs) > > > { > > > - arm64_enter_from_user_mode(regs); > > > + arm64_enter_from_user_mode_syscall(regs); > > > cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_svc_handler(); > > > local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX); > > > do_el0_svc_compat(regs); > > > +linux-man > > This part of the rseq man page needs to be fixed as well I think. The > kernel no longer reliably provides clearing of rseq_cs on preemption, > right? > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/librseq/librseq.git/tree/doc/man/rseq.2#n241 +Michael Jeanson That page seems to be maintained separately, as part of the librseq project. Have a lovely day! Alex > > "and set to NULL by the kernel when it restarts an assembly > instruction sequence block, > as well as when the kernel detects that it is preempting or delivering > a signal outside of the range targeted by the rseq_cs." > --