From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C91109C02F for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:33:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=5rta02Onm0qeuXEZF0HcOxMb+qiRyBBcKxQaID0hT3E=; b=LbAxkhvvpt98L0vBAEV7Zdoh2e AOvDT7j4Q20dbTtlf4mBq2fgmMoAVlOB8WWvePnuIyD/YZtR476qt4q7W8kVz2uidM+ieiWAtyXYh W/f9I39s2Dp3P4PJqXVwGfB88Y0j00BMlnwQKJD0brkuvwQQFdisRUsEbBKY0bnU3yWRQv/jcacw+ xrZMCNe63A1yzCfDQ1Psi3GnEPnT2KocFNrBFjP4EW0rxP8EjD2CNLBc/8XgODVvnrwbv7N/MgFaX wbq9A5tpyWmrql4qCkmL/ysiA5aTxvoFNC5FiW5CoaO2xaN1gcdtYZhJ3LKzLg7r+TTmqOoXy7tEJ PcEMxWrA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w5QEE-00000003ngI-1Nag; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:33:06 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w5QE6-00000003nf0-2zaK for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:32:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00A6600AC; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C30ECC116C6; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:32:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774452777; bh=7Q7S5BUEPnjJPL+sZVIXSsmkmWcRrS8Apgpdbcvnh48=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=A2FomEXrTMPyqxzxStLtMsZG/Zisr9kMk1EKI14uWOQ8knCEFgEa459V7sDg6IZ40 IOZ2/WTTIRPJtB2/99NDbrCSMb3MqP/OCZSLcrk+N8XPPRUSZgnZF+R+6H5r5Y+yqk sjdNaocYIQ3CnHR/ddTab6GzQ0adaHbG34IBwj4hp23lSPLhnNXzdLcz4beBFWXkgz IRpsJTyVuXs8mehyJHySSc7uNHx+xB+6UU2j0WWrsqVzwdZjD78PL2gRqmAaAqw577 eJawpY2Uf5ffcZOT6yP2F5oZtnoDY/L6UnLRtBIV+43RSs3DR/BcPIUAYNgSvhFGoX veUcY23jail8g== Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:32:50 +0000 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" To: Andrew Morton Cc: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , Baolin Wang , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, riel@surriel.com, harry.yoo@oracle.com, jannh@google.com, willy@infradead.org, dev.jain@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] mm: rmap: support batched checks of the references for large folios Message-ID: References: <43831628-a00f-4292-9797-cb96a029bb00@kernel.org> <86f611cb-1292-44e4-b629-6503135d33ca@kernel.org> <20260325083016.a32095bea3f04488a7c9005a@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260325083016.a32095bea3f04488a7c9005a@linux-foundation.org> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 08:30:16AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:06:26 +0000 "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" wrote: > > > > > Sorry unclear here - does the series need more work or does a follow up patch > > > > need more work? > > > > > > Follow up! > > > > Ok good as in mm-stable now. Sadly means I don't get to review it but there we > > go. > > Well, this was sent 6 weeks ago, at v6! Yup I know, I've struggled to clear my backlog. > > But please go ahead. If review is very bad, there's git-rebase > (happens sometimes) or some followup fix and a minor bisection hole > (happens a bit more often). > > And those followup fixes will trickle in all the way out to 7.1-rc7, > via the hotfixes path. This happens a great deal - about half(?) of > hotfixes pertain to material we added in the current -rc cycle. > Well given the other tags it's unlikely that would happen, so it doesn't feel really worthwhile at this point. Really I guess I'd like to know the timing of when mm-stable is taken so I can know the deadline for stuff like this. Thanks, Lorenzo