On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Leo Yan wrote:

> > It's not glibc specific so it seems reasonable to keep it in gcs-util.h,
> > even though we don't currently have any nolibc stuff that uses ptrace.
> > That said this isn't particularly strongly held opinion so I don't
> > *really* mind either way.

> Does below change make sense to you?

That looks fine to me.