From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C891CFF8875 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:27:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ZicstlCEy3IWZiOQN/EqQrzbm+06rnQtEWNLsCVGooE=; b=T9qhKqxPzc80HrdIzIGZogZd96 k2vowGGxA0ayiprPKow1zPsZJp7FMJo9YL39/e2xhyJKZ/se8Af14RhnBU3BlzXNmx7gFBfkOo1F1 Rv/z/z3NcF48QZwF0peWiDrkPq/Qh6jsyX93kv9K43XxFYd92dcjsnOu9xfKPAmPis4A7bs8sMIGe dbrAyKLtuQxrrLK3MGCY0C2ffJgGRMCh4BaieXOssQ3Vcbq21J7tPvii8qIF5oWykwpyWlLYFTdoG 2ZniIONRyn7pTpqPqoEn/LZj/6cRJJCOSybSDpMoVoZEzg7upbk65yvD9Y3dWA90uMa5+k+YRLvJL PXB2V4zQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wHrpT-00000002bwy-0vUj; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:26:59 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wHrpQ-00000002bvl-1HkI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:26:57 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CED40B54; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F957C2BCB7; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 23:26:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777418815; bh=ZicstlCEy3IWZiOQN/EqQrzbm+06rnQtEWNLsCVGooE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AxMMgw6br9IYs5kUlF1aeVc43ekD0MINnQFVcc3+dfepsNX1bn3YwkAhj376oIxEr pMzBVcM6hwG5KQG/OPdsBJqpF6d2RyOFweZNGgE+eZZrJTAX+L3quYd9SNuBvP2310 y4F9vXe6rAE8WoohyUS8w8Amw5Y68T9AK8rfq+9Zpb8Xcjvm2sx9FKKOADhwzzpTeU Va90VfwICsFOlsmymfyKcuXPVWB95ABgTCeTKUcE4HCY6nAbhAXkjMECdLYSI9hx4o 79HWNmb1vfuvClF5kLMBrzOCEZ2CyVYBm+pI+jYb0vfCay1z6iGMm4SKH0a63oqNDo Jhr5RBFgh6diA== Received: by finisterre.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E7F61AC5842; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:26:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:26:51 +0900 From: Mark Brown To: Leo Yan Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Shuah Khan , Thiago Jung Bauermann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kselftest/arm64: Fix build failure with GCC-15 Message-ID: References: <20260422-selftests_arm64_gcc15-v2-1-c0134de8838a@arm.com> <63409143-f4eb-48c3-89de-1aef4fb57381@sirena.org.uk> <20260428101513.GE16537@e132581.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pCVtL2GPjLu+SJ3O" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260428101513.GE16537@e132581.arm.com> X-Cookie: 667: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260428_162656_371262_AF1C95BF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --pCVtL2GPjLu+SJ3O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Leo Yan wrote: > > It's not glibc specific so it seems reasonable to keep it in gcs-util.h, > > even though we don't currently have any nolibc stuff that uses ptrace. > > That said this isn't particularly strongly held opinion so I don't > > *really* mind either way. > Does below change make sense to you? That looks fine to me. --pCVtL2GPjLu+SJ3O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmnxQjoACgkQJNaLcl1U h9D+Mgf/egrEQwsX1P3T4kqHQcwCAKPkC9IlRDqUTJ+Va678AdjBDlbahJ3ebpzM 1XHWOpofkLnm0Rrngp9tCcta37e9xapMRRvIjRT9aPZf57rbwIOiIsecNOr96v4Z bKXKw4yeALHiRvfkHa61gm7JDn0IG2PvRYkStDH0I9AnDEf3//j0bbquOitFuRS8 QqOD59Uh0nMsnnj1Ms7Y1OFzyXgFQk6vyZjN6oTfaXL4PmPM+GE+W4DSo8EaCZsD jU8VEBMeWezzSa86urtGanZWgrG77VlDcCTlV7kT9lwcnd0zFkrrMlVLuUFFj8sl vC0Tj2ZlO1/rfrkvrVxdSXDYmJX7Cg== =HRmc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pCVtL2GPjLu+SJ3O--