public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fredrik Markstrom <fredrik.markstrom@est.tech>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	Ivar Holmqvist <ivar.holmqvist@est.tech>,
	Malin Jonsson <malin.jonsson@est.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: perf: Skip device memory during user callchain unwinding
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 11:54:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afR4an4IkuvjwOog@elx-5cg6022w5t> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430-master-with-pfix-v3-v2-1-bd526ec04a75@est.tech>

As pointed out by Sashiko there is a TOCTOU race between the page
table walk (which checks for device memory) and the
copy_from_user_inatomic (which reads the frame). Another thread
could mmap device memory at the target address in between.

Three options:

1. Accept the race — it requires a cooperating thread with precise
   timing, and the guard still eliminates the common case (stable
   device mappings).
2. Use mmap_read_trylock() once per unwind, held across all frames:
   a. Fall back to the lockless walk (best-effort) when the trylock fails.
   b. Stop unwinding user space entirely when the trylock fails.

Option 2 adds mmap_lock contention per unwind. Is the race narrow
enough to accept, or is the trylock approach preferred?


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-01  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-30 10:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: perf: Skip device memory during user callchain unwinding Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Fredrik Markstrom
2026-05-01  9:54   ` Fredrik Markstrom [this message]
2026-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] DO NOT MERGE: arm64: perf: Add skip_vmio parameter to control device memory callchain guard Fredrik Markstrom
2026-04-30 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] DO NOT MERGE: selftests: perf_events: Add device memory callchain unwinding test Fredrik Markstrom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afR4an4IkuvjwOog@elx-5cg6022w5t \
    --to=fredrik.markstrom@est.tech \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=ivar.holmqvist@est.tech \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=malin.jonsson@est.tech \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox