From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mst@redhat.com (Michael S. Tsirkin) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:12:35 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] mn10300: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org The only reason uaccess routines might sleep is if they fault. Make this explicit. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- arch/mn10300/include/asm/uaccess.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mn10300/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/mn10300/include/asm/uaccess.h index 780560b..107508a 100644 --- a/arch/mn10300/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/mn10300/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -471,13 +471,13 @@ extern unsigned long __generic_copy_from_user(void *, const void __user *, #define __copy_to_user(to, from, n) \ ({ \ - might_sleep(); \ + might_fault(); \ __copy_to_user_inatomic((to), (from), (n)); \ }) #define __copy_from_user(to, from, n) \ ({ \ - might_sleep(); \ + might_fault(); \ __copy_from_user_inatomic((to), (from), (n)); \ }) -- MST