public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v5: Add IWB to ACPI probe dependency control
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 10:48:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afsAVO+vTQp2r/EI@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875x51y6gi.ffs@tglx>

On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, May 05 2026 at 10:48, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Arm GICv5 systems, wired IRQs routed to an IWB may require resolving
> 
> S/IRQs/interrupts/g
> 
> Changelogs are prose and not an acronym dump ground.
> 
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c        | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c              |  1 +
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-iwb.c |  5 +++++
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5.c     | 13 +++++++++++--
> >  include/linux/acpi_iort.h        |  3 ++-
> 
> I'm confused about the conglomerate of files affected by an irqchip
> change...

True, I can split the ACPI changes into a separate patch though on its
own it would not be that useful because the resulting code would have
no user - I will do what you and Rafael prefer.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx


      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-06  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-05  8:48 [PATCH 0/2] irqchip: Arm GICv5 IWB ACPI IRQ probe deferral Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-05-05  8:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers/acpi: Move RISC-V interrupt controllers autodep to ACPI IRQ code Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-05-05  8:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/gic-v5: Add IWB to ACPI probe dependency control Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-05-05 19:58   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-05-06  8:48     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afsAVO+vTQp2r/EI@lpieralisi \
    --to=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox