Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>,
	Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the HW arm_smmu_cmd in cmdq submission functions
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 09:21:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afxZrBaz0YZ9XF2u@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3-v1-b7dc0a0d4aa0+3723d-smmu_no_cmdq_ent_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 11:29:12AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Continue removing struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent in favour of the HW based
> struct arm_smmu_cmd. Switch the lower level issue commands to work on
> the native struct by lifting arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd() into all the
> callers.
> 
> Following patches will revise each of the arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd()
> call sites to replace it with the HW struct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>

Thanks,
Mostafa

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 53 ++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 5cdeaec890592f..67d23e9c54804e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -921,31 +921,23 @@ int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>  }
>  
>  static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> -				     struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent,
> +				     struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd,
>  				     bool sync)
>  {
> -	struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd;
> -
> -	if (unlikely(arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, ent))) {
> -		dev_warn(smmu->dev, "ignoring unknown CMDQ opcode 0x%x\n",
> -			 ent->opcode);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
>  	return arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(
> -		smmu, arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu, &cmd), cmd.data, 1, sync);
> +		smmu, arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu, cmd), cmd->data, 1, sync);
>  }
>  
>  static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> -				   struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
> +				   struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd)
>  {
> -	return __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, ent, false);
> +	return __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, cmd, false);
>  }
>  
>  static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> -					     struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
> +					     struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd)
>  {
> -	return __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, ent, true);
> +	return __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, cmd, true);
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> @@ -1013,6 +1005,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_page_response(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *unused
>  	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd = {0};
>  	struct arm_smmu_master *master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>  	int sid = master->streams[0].id;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cmd hw_cmd;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON(!master->stall_enabled))
>  		return;
> @@ -1032,7 +1025,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_page_response(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *unused
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(master->smmu, &cmd);
> +	arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(hw_cmd.data, &cmd);
> +	arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(master->smmu, &hw_cmd);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't send a SYNC, it doesn't do anything for RESUME or PRI_RESP.
>  	 * RESUME consumption guarantees that the stalled transaction will be
> @@ -1861,14 +1856,16 @@ static void arm_smmu_ste_writer_sync_entry(struct arm_smmu_entry_writer *writer)
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_ste_writer *ste_writer =
>  		container_of(writer, struct arm_smmu_ste_writer, writer);
> -	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd = {
> +	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = {
>  		.opcode	= CMDQ_OP_CFGI_STE,
>  		.cfgi	= {
>  			.sid	= ste_writer->sid,
>  			.leaf	= true,
>  		},
>  	};
> +	struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd;
>  
> +	arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, &ent);
>  	arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(writer->master->smmu, &cmd);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1896,11 +1893,13 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_ste(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  	/* It's likely that we'll want to use the new STE soon */
>  	if (!(smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH)) {
>  		struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent
> -			prefetch_cmd = { .opcode = CMDQ_OP_PREFETCH_CFG,
> +			prefetch_ent = { .opcode = CMDQ_OP_PREFETCH_CFG,
>  					 .prefetch = {
>  						 .sid = sid,
>  					 } };
> +		struct arm_smmu_cmd prefetch_cmd;
>  
> +		arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(prefetch_cmd.data, &prefetch_ent);
>  		arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &prefetch_cmd);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -2328,7 +2327,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_handle_ppr(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u64 *evt)
>  		 evt[1] & PRIQ_1_ADDR_MASK);
>  
>  	if (last) {
> -		struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd = {
> +		struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = {
>  			.opcode			= CMDQ_OP_PRI_RESP,
>  			.substream_valid	= ssv,
>  			.pri			= {
> @@ -2338,7 +2337,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_handle_ppr(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u64 *evt)
>  				.resp	= PRI_RESP_DENY,
>  			},
>  		};
> +		struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd;
>  
> +		arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, &ent);
>  		arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &cmd);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -3446,6 +3447,7 @@ arm_smmu_install_new_domain_invs(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
>  static void arm_smmu_inv_flush_iotlb_tag(struct arm_smmu_inv *inv)
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd = {};
> +	struct arm_smmu_cmd hw_cmd;
>  
>  	switch (inv->type) {
>  	case INV_TYPE_S1_ASID:
> @@ -3460,7 +3462,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_inv_flush_iotlb_tag(struct arm_smmu_inv *inv)
>  	}
>  
>  	cmd.opcode = inv->nsize_opcode;
> -	arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(inv->smmu, &cmd);
> +	arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(hw_cmd.data, &cmd);
> +	arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(inv->smmu, &hw_cmd);
>  }
>  
>  /* Should be installed after arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev() */
> @@ -4823,7 +4826,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	u32 reg, enables;
> -	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd;
>  
>  	/* Clear CR0 and sync (disables SMMU and queue processing) */
>  	reg = readl_relaxed(smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_CR0);
> @@ -4870,16 +4874,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Invalidate any cached configuration */
> -	cmd.opcode = CMDQ_OP_CFGI_ALL;
> +	ent.opcode = CMDQ_OP_CFGI_ALL;
> +	arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, &ent);
>  	arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(smmu, &cmd);
>  
>  	/* Invalidate any stale TLB entries */
>  	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HYP) {
> -		cmd.opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_EL2_ALL;
> +		ent.opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_EL2_ALL;
> +		arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, &ent);
>  		arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(smmu, &cmd);
>  	}
>  
> -	cmd.opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NSNH_ALL;
> +	ent.opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NSNH_ALL;
> +	arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, &ent);
>  	arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(smmu, &cmd);
>  
>  	/* Event queue */
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-07  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-01 14:29 [PATCH 0/9] Remove SMMUv3 struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add struct arm_smmu_cmd to represent the HW format command Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-06  6:11   ` Nicolin Chen
2026-05-06 23:41   ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-07  9:19   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08  7:29   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the HW arm_smmu_cmd in cmdq selection functions Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:21   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08 15:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-08  7:47   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-08 15:54     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-08 16:58       ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the HW arm_smmu_cmd in cmdq submission functions Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:21   ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2026-05-08  8:27   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-08 16:00     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-08 17:00       ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds to struct arm_smmu_cmd Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:22   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08  9:26   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove CMDQ_OP_CFGI_CD_ALL from arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd() Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:22   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08  9:45   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-08 16:02     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-08 17:17       ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Directly encode simple commands Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:22   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08 11:33   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-08 17:37     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-08 20:09       ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-08 23:36         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-10 18:59           ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Directly encode CMDQ_OP_ATC_INV Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:23   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08 11:46   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-09 16:54     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Directly encode CMDQ_OP_SYNC Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:23   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08 13:41   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-01 14:29 ` [PATCH 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Directly encode TLBI commands Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:24   ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08 14:00   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-07  9:26 ` [PATCH 0/9] Remove SMMUv3 struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-08 14:03 ` Pranjal Shrivastava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afxZrBaz0YZ9XF2u@google.com \
    --to=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox