Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	jean-philippe@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	qperret@google.com, tabba@google.com, vdonnefort@google.com,
	sebastianene@google.com, keirf@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move TLB range invalidation into common code
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 09:40:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afxd8Km40A5ulZvd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afsPfEzgGtAFrN5P@ziepe.ca>

On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 06:53:00AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 04:43:13PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 01:17:09PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 12:15:17PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I am not sure if it’s worth it, the hypervisor is much simpler, there
> > > > is a single page table, it’s locked (also identity mapped), it’s
> > > > updated on VM boot/teardown only, we don’t even use iotlb_gather at
> > > > the moment, although possible but I wanted to keep this series as
> > > > simple as I can then we can add more features later.
> > > > So this patch is the least intrusive change, as whatever the main SMMUv3
> > > > driver does, the range tlb invalidation logic is the same.
> > > > But I am happy to experiment with that when posted.
> > > 
> > > Okay, then maybe just always push a full invalidation?
> > 
> > Like full address space invalidation? that will not be optimal and
> > will affect every device on the system, why would we do that if we
> > know the address?
> 
> Not every device, just wipe the VMID. If you say it is rare then keep
> it simple. If you need to be narrow then use the proper infastructure
> with a gather. No reason to make something boutique for pkvm here.

But all devices share the same VMID, which impacts all devices on the
system, and is not that rare to ignore.

I can add gather support, it’s not that complicated, it is currently
supported in Android.
But that doesn’t solve the problem, which is: At some point, whether
eagerly from the page table code, through gather sync or a fancy
invalidation array, the driver will need to populate a range
invalidation command (tg, ttl, scale...) and this logic is better
shared with the main driver which is this patch does.

Thanks,
Mostafa

> 
> Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-07  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-01 11:19 [PATCH v6 00/25] KVM: arm64: SMMUv3 driver for pKVM (trap and emulate) Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] KVM: arm64: Generalize trace clock Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] KVM: arm64: Donate MMIO to the hypervisor Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Split code with hyp Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 12:44   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-04 12:13     ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 04/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move TLB range invalidation into common code Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 12:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-04 12:15     ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-05 16:17       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-05 16:43         ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-06  9:53           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07  9:40             ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2026-05-09 23:29               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move IDR parsing to common functions Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 12:47   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-04 12:16     ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-05 16:27       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-05 16:48         ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-06  9:56           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-07 10:13             ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-09 23:34               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Rework to use the iommu-pages API Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 12:24   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-04 12:19     ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-09 23:21       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] KVM: arm64: iommu: Introduce IOMMU driver infrastructure Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] KVM: arm64: iommu: Shadow host stage-2 page table Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 13:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-04 12:28     ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-09 23:27       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] KVM: arm64: iommu: Add memory pool Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] KVM: arm64: iommu: Support DABT for IOMMU Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Add SMMUv3 driver Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Add the kernel driver Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Probe SMMU HW Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 12:51   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-04 12:30     ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Add MMIO emulation Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Shadow the command queue Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Add CMDQ functions Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Emulate CMDQ for host Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Shadow stream table Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Shadow STEs Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Share other queues Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Emulate GBPA Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Support io-pgtable-arm in the hypervisor Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Shadow the CPU stage-2 page table Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-kvm: Enable nesting Mostafa Saleh
2026-05-01 11:19 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] KVM: arm64: Add documentation for pKVM DMA isolation Mostafa Saleh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afxd8Km40A5ulZvd@google.com \
    --to=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=keirf@google.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=sebastianene@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox