From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] gpio: remove machine hogs
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 22:27:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag1GJygtLgngKQqj@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ag0Dn66ZVnbTc7J2@google.com>
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 05:46:50PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 01:42:41PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > With no more users, remove legacy machine hog API from the kernel.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Argh! What is the replacement for this? I have patches for rsk7203 to
> use them to get rid of legacy gpio use, like this:
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-rsk/devices-rsk7203.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-rsk/devices-rsk7203.c
> index f8760a91e2f1..5bbd3b31cffb 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-rsk/devices-rsk7203.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-rsk/devices-rsk7203.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/smsc911x.h>
> #include <linux/input.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/property.h>
> #include <asm/machvec.h>
> @@ -165,6 +165,19 @@ static const struct platform_device_info rsk7203_devices[] __initconst = {
> },
> };
>
> +/* The base of the function GPIOs in the flat enum */
> +#define SH7203_FN_BASE GPIO_FN_PINT7_PB
> +
> +static struct gpiod_hog rsk7203_gpio_hogs[] = {
> + GPIO_HOG("sh7203_pfc-fn", GPIO_FN_TXD0 - SH7203_FN_BASE,
> + "TXD0", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, GPIOD_ASIS),
> + GPIO_HOG("sh7203_pfc-fn", GPIO_FN_RXD0 - SH7203_FN_BASE,
> + "RXD0", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, GPIOD_ASIS),
> + GPIO_HOG("sh7203_pfc-fn", GPIO_FN_IRQ0_PB - SH7203_FN_BASE,
> + "IRQ0_PB", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, GPIOD_ASIS),
> + { }
> +};
> +
> static int __init rsk7203_devices_setup(void)
> {
> struct platform_device *pd;
> @@ -172,12 +185,10 @@ static int __init rsk7203_devices_setup(void)
> int i;
>
> /* Select pins for SCIF0 */
> - gpio_request(GPIO_FN_TXD0, NULL);
> - gpio_request(GPIO_FN_RXD0, NULL);
> + gpiod_add_hogs(rsk7203_gpio_hogs);
>
> /* Setup LAN9118: CS1 in 16-bit Big Endian Mode, IRQ0 at Port B */
> __raw_writel(0x36db0400, 0xfffc0008); /* CS1BCR */
> - gpio_request(GPIO_FN_IRQ0_PB, NULL);
>
> error = software_node_register_node_group(rsk7203_swnodes);
> if (error) {
>
>
> If there is no replacement maybe we can resurrect this? Or shoudl we
> have add swnode support for hogs?
Hmm, I guess it is already there so I should simply switch. Sorry about
the noise.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 12:42 [PATCH v2 0/6] gpiolib: unify gpio-hog code Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] gpio: of: clear OF_POPULATED on hog nodes in remove path Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] gpio: move hogs into GPIO core Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-24 16:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] gpio: sim: use fwnode-based GPIO hogs Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: omap1: ams-delta: convert GPIO hogs to using firmware nodes Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] gpio: remove machine hogs Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-20 0:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-20 5:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2026-05-20 6:55 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] gpio: sim: allow to define the active-low setting of a simulated hog Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-16 9:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] gpiolib: unify gpio-hog code Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag1GJygtLgngKQqj@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jmkrzyszt@gmail.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=westeri@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox