From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5FACD6E4C for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 05:01:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=e129xfl2uwbBORZTKnJ3i22zjcF3b+7zkkUcuJrSRlM=; b=gmo6FOLbdTRrp6lOmwphe3NYO+ Gnn2NkFOZ/L69VNRkPiNvTleM/9r20rAqbmqG5oA0xj5wruk4EP4j5GtvE9khJXJ9isJBxoyRxXLy hXarb0c9ntyg16myFO+mZhHP04ozAo5xHnKFTjnfB6/fwun+1gsc9LxIfaccAqdABSs23EQNTcnz3 pLAWf8IRNj2HuCxYqVbONnfsv5ZjprO2hYYTpzlzsY7XSvN0s+XzELLKM1NsFoJhoICZKmEVZ4xyw TbgT3/2gakx2y9jHSrPiM1+h/74Ofde0ECXAI5uEk/iEeNRvvIjAEveSYJOm2GIlZJQKSh7gMlT6l 9kX1nR6g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wTull-0000000A8Vm-348G; Mon, 01 Jun 2026 05:00:57 +0000 Received: from out-185.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wTulj-0000000A8UV-1moT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2026 05:00:57 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:00:34 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1780290042; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=e129xfl2uwbBORZTKnJ3i22zjcF3b+7zkkUcuJrSRlM=; b=jK8M9tTSYsgWEa+miw8zUAseNoC+gbcuCv9nUMAsDdJneXEMD6zUH9KN3eu6lVTxSHEXW2 hSHndFlGvSyxQ7zV+0TKSQTKSS3hHU6muR0MeW7qGoat01tQoLxr28BDKQvwXidIPuZNdp eGw38CLTieSZYcpODkiAlFiju9A6r0w= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Baoquan He To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Will Deacon , Wandun Chen , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, zhaomeijing@lixiang.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org, kernel@xen0n.name, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, robh@kernel.org, saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org, ruirui.yang@linux.dev, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, quic_obabatun@quicinc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] arm64: kdump: exclude non-dumpable reserved memory regions from vmcore Message-ID: References: <20260527032917.3385849-1-chenwandun1@gmail.com> <20260527032917.3385849-10-chenwandun1@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260531_220055_880558_1167DF6A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 05/30/26 at 07:25pm, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 11:29:15AM +0800, Wandun Chen wrote: ...snip... > There are patches that move common code to kernel/crash_core.c: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260525084932.934910-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com > > Review from arch maintainers would be helpful there ;-) Before, Andrew would put patch candidates into his mm tree and trigger testing. If any adjustment, he would take them off. Can we do the similar thing for kexec/kdump patches, unless the patches are objected explicitly? Thanks Baoquan