From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Preserve all guest ZCR_EL2.LEN values
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 15:34:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah4I_G_T_-bZ7pgb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529-kvm-arm64-fix-zcr-len-nv-v2-1-86cad51992bd@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 12:01:44AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Since commit b3d29a823099 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Handle ZCR_EL2 traps") when
> guests write to ZCR_EL2 we have clamped the value of ZCR_EL2.LEN to be
> at most that configuring the maximum guest VL when accessed directly as
> ZCR_EL2. This is not clearly the behaviour the architecture documents
> for ZCR_EL2.LEN, while things are a little ambiguous currently there is
> a fairly direct reading that suggests values will be read as written.
> Further, the documented procedure for enumerating vector lengths means
> that it is expected that values larger than the largest supported vector
> length will be written in practice.
>
> The reasoning for the current behaviour is not specifically articulated, my
> best guess is that it is intended to ensure that the guest can not see an
> effective VL greater than the maximum that has been configured, though
> this will be ineffective when a VHE guest uses the ZCR_EL1 accessor.
> The VL can instead be constrained by configuring ZCR_EL2 when loading
> L2 guest state:
>
> - When the L2 guest is running in EL1 or EL0 state configure
> ZCR_EL2.LEN to the minimum of the guest ZCR_EL2.LEN and
> vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu)-1.
> - When the L2 guest is running at EL2 configure the maximum VL for
> the guest in ZCR_EL2.LEN like we do for L1 guests and load the
> guest ZCR_EL2 into ZCR_EL1.
>
> This will ensure that the effective VL seen by the guest is always
> constrained by all of the maximum VL configured by the VMM and the
> ZCR_ELx values in effect.
>
> With the above implemented we can simplify the emulation for trapped
> writes to ZCR_EL2 to store LEN configured by the guest directly,
> matching the handling for ZCR_EL1. We still need to sanitise the values
> written to ensure no unsupported fields are written, do this by adding
> the register to our generic sanitisation infrastructure. This register
> is a bit unusual in that as an unnamed field at bits 8:4 which is
> RAZ/WI, for the purposes of sanitisation treat these bits as though they
> were RES0.
>
> Fixes: b3d29a823099 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Handle ZCR_EL2 traps")
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Yeah... Can't say what I was thinking here.
With Marc's changelog suggestion:
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use generic santisation infrastructure.
> - Remove redundant !is_hyp_ctxt() check.
> - Also fix ZCR_EL2 configuration in __hyp_sve_restore_guest().
> - Commit message clarifications.
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260522-kvm-arm64-fix-zcr-len-nv-v1-1-ec254e9078cf@kernel.org
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 16 ++++++++++------
> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 5 +++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 6 +-----
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 65eead8362e0..a49042bfa801 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -511,7 +511,6 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
> ACTLR_EL2, /* Auxiliary Control Register (EL2) */
> CPTR_EL2, /* Architectural Feature Trap Register (EL2) */
> HACR_EL2, /* Hypervisor Auxiliary Control Register */
> - ZCR_EL2, /* SVE Control Register (EL2) */
> TTBR0_EL2, /* Translation Table Base Register 0 (EL2) */
> TTBR1_EL2, /* Translation Table Base Register 1 (EL2) */
> TCR_EL2, /* Translation Control Register (EL2) */
> @@ -543,6 +542,7 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
> SCTLR2_EL2, /* System Control Register 2 (EL2) */
> MDCR_EL2, /* Monitor Debug Configuration Register (EL2) */
> CNTHCTL_EL2, /* Counter-timer Hypervisor Control register */
> + ZCR_EL2, /* SVE Control Register (EL2) */
>
> /* Any VNCR-capable reg goes after this point */
> MARKER(__VNCR_START__),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> index bf0eb5e43427..320cd45d49c5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> @@ -462,11 +462,13 @@ static inline bool kvm_hyp_handle_mops(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>
> static inline void __hyp_sve_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + u64 zcr_el2 = vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1;
> +
> /*
> * The vCPU's saved SVE state layout always matches the max VL of the
> * vCPU. Start off with the max VL so we can load the SVE state.
> */
> - sve_cond_update_zcr_vq(vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1, SYS_ZCR_EL2);
> + sve_cond_update_zcr_vq(zcr_el2, SYS_ZCR_EL2);
> __sve_restore_state(vcpu_sve_pffr(vcpu),
> &vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs.fpsr,
> true);
> @@ -476,8 +478,10 @@ static inline void __hyp_sve_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * nested guest, as the guest hypervisor could select a smaller VL. Slap
> * that into hardware before wrapping up.
> */
> - if (is_nested_ctxt(vcpu))
> - sve_cond_update_zcr_vq(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL2), SYS_ZCR_EL2);
> + if (is_nested_ctxt(vcpu)) {
> + zcr_el2 = min(zcr_el2, __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL2));
> + sve_cond_update_zcr_vq(zcr_el2, SYS_ZCR_EL2);
> + }
>
> write_sysreg_el1(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, vcpu_sve_zcr_elx(vcpu)), SYS_ZCR);
> }
> @@ -501,11 +505,11 @@ static inline void fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return;
>
> if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu)) {
> + zcr_el2 = vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1;
> +
> /* A guest hypervisor may restrict the effective max VL. */
> if (is_nested_ctxt(vcpu))
> - zcr_el2 = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL2);
> - else
> - zcr_el2 = vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1;
> + zcr_el2 = min(zcr_el2, __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL2));
>
> write_sysreg_el2(zcr_el2, SYS_ZCR);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index 883b6c1008fb..38f672e94087 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -1834,6 +1834,11 @@ int kvm_init_nv_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> resx.res1 = VNCR_EL2_RES1;
> set_sysreg_masks(kvm, VNCR_EL2, resx);
>
> + /* ZCR_EL2 - bits 8:4 are RAZ/WI so treat them as RES0 */
> + resx.res0 = ZCR_ELx_RES0 | GENMASK_ULL(8, 4);
> + resx.res1 = ZCR_ELx_RES1;
> + set_sysreg_masks(kvm, ZCR_EL2, resx);
> +
> out:
> for (enum vcpu_sysreg sr = __SANITISED_REG_START__; sr < NR_SYS_REGS; sr++)
> __vcpu_rmw_sys_reg(vcpu, sr, |=, 0);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 148fc3400ea8..77e1b5d223c6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -2862,8 +2862,6 @@ static bool access_zcr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct sys_reg_params *p,
> const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> {
> - unsigned int vq;
> -
> if (guest_hyp_sve_traps_enabled(vcpu)) {
> kvm_inject_nested_sve_trap(vcpu);
> return false;
> @@ -2874,9 +2872,7 @@ static bool access_zcr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return true;
> }
>
> - vq = SYS_FIELD_GET(ZCR_ELx, LEN, p->regval) + 1;
> - vq = min(vq, vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu));
> - __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL2, vq - 1);
> + __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL2, p->regval);
> return true;
> }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 5200f5f493f79f14bbdc349e402a40dfb32f23c8
> change-id: 20260519-kvm-arm64-fix-zcr-len-nv-9e9e7bae012a
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 23:01 [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Preserve all guest ZCR_EL2.LEN values Mark Brown
2026-05-29 9:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-29 9:46 ` Joey Gouly
2026-06-01 22:34 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ah4I_G_T_-bZ7pgb@kernel.org \
--to=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox