From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1225FCD5BB8 for ; Sat, 23 May 2026 16:57:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=51WmkaTpoQy7JTlSmGFOduVIA7YtA+KZBmfdwn/BfZs=; b=JPMhQPUHQyBIn6sGwLy3FTh2Q3 lE6x+7F2bnFjecNz+14ZoLVbTZspdAzblwfAPjQxb3TSxrCn0xvS8ailJ0YZR+Le+nQlKXIqLAGzu Bg3tKq7ghSZuXGX9madiDZ1X6sFImW2hx5Sx62502ZtPd5TQlvCNrf69FMo/w2oiAslTONYRy7UMe Sb82VoQgS9cmSIfA58nsIgGq38wjRKCyuLW2YZwdRdPY8EsB+3GZiJ7hwAFKDOXL9+0EEWadtXc98 r4VotmEQ6Pwo1aluN31xG/o6qlVboxZ8s4BYfO6gecvtVLQyccuHOMnQm87Zr+ff7CInJA5nKFp5X HDFgBc2w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wQpfK-0000000DbjN-1oFc; Sat, 23 May 2026 16:57:34 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wQpfH-0000000Dbik-1aAb; Sat, 23 May 2026 16:57:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id C89634453C; Sat, 23 May 2026 16:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id E84C31F00A3E; Sat, 23 May 2026 16:57:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779555450; bh=51WmkaTpoQy7JTlSmGFOduVIA7YtA+KZBmfdwn/BfZs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=JzalX7S1OQFj5tROKOpmcYv//3t5uHJY0f0PEwfyfcr+sGJa3oLpl6D82PQWvMRYz qs9EtzBslP7tPKKSvWVGe6c0LsCdxZ8ibiLTWPAnnNWpGi9znJb7C1kkEocHYB49Ux 0bC+HcIVQ/4dHCJ2KItUnB0KVKpF2RruPAQjkLF7TYWsJODyQtKjXqYE0zV4YGxuw8 j+DFSrUcBhju9rm6L6Lfy+ziu436v6uTuO5zvfgmuYOgDEGDqrm4xWqPwq4nzwi7LV nQyxyof0/EQ53AlLVRctTwPjZDmhn7btwhS1afKSt+IJEpaQX8hHDPA7KgmRgcvy14 5Y0HtACXl1PKg== Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 18:57:27 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= To: Shiji Yang , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pwm: mediatek: fix mt7628 register offset and clock source Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7oykrngwmuffi3h4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260523_095731_432254_4EFCB9D2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.40 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --7oykrngwmuffi3h4 Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pwm: mediatek: fix mt7628 register offset and clock source MIME-Version: 1.0 hello, On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 05:44:32PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 04:51:00PM +0800, Shiji Yang wrote: > > This patch series fixes support for mt7628. >=20 > The series looks reasonable to me. It would be great to get some > feedback from the Mediatek maintainers, though?! I applied the two patches now without further feedback to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/fixes =2E Not sure yet if I send this branch to Linus before 7.1, but it will be part of 7.2-rc1 for sure. Best regards Uwe --7oykrngwmuffi3h4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmoR3HQACgkQj4D7WH0S /k68NAf+JYTK6hgKb3FaAZld7lR7pNXHtTQ4akG5pJ6JxE822aHEcUTeI56XneoG cQDFIG2Hi1ToYH+GMeOXNYSNPNfMBQ4AlL1o40fdgb3ejbBWhYyNRw4sSUOQXRM7 ylidhcdkmUMfRNvHBz1wE0f9dQR4nr3FlD8HyegEKmGvim90J+8QEoWNsUh2XSwG CFCm7ne9mEFZGoCZOqC8A0ndnhY+DHqfSL5+hoh6aGAIH/Bbu2OwtvdUiB1Q/1f4 xSGarP+7Nt5+Vbu8/nwvwPOKvOALq04d+hxYGaDr26FtThmHh+oBVd3yD8ZHBNLW cE+RN/SiWGg3nJg1M49svWpJis2pyg== =vHOi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7oykrngwmuffi3h4--