From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: tabba@google.com
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: arm64: Fix host/hyp tracking on share/unshare hypercall failure
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 11:12:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah_99d29qLuQey35@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529121755.2923500-1-tabba@google.com>
On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 01:17:52PM +0100, tabba@google.com wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The first two started as bugs I found testing Sashiko locally with
> fixes to review-prompts. The third grew out of the v1 discussion.
>
> share_pfn_hyp() and unshare_pfn_hyp() in arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c maintain
> a host-side RB-tree mirroring the set of pages shared with EL2. The
> hypercalls they wrap can fail (page-state mismatch, EL2 refcount still
> held), and neither the per-pfn helpers nor the multi-page wrappers
> cleaned up correctly on failure:
>
> - share_pfn_hyp() left its tracking node in the tree on failure,
> leaking the allocation and presenting a phantom share to a later
> unshare (patch 1).
>
> - unshare_pfn_hyp() erased its tracking node before the hypercall, so
> on failure the host lost its record while EL2 still owned the share
> (patch 2).
>
> - kvm_share_hyp() returned on the first per-page failure, stranding the
> pages already shared by that call: the caller treats the whole range
> as failed and never unshares them (patch 3).
>
> As Vincent and Marc noted on v1, none of this compromises isolation. A
> page that cannot be unshared is simply leaked: it stays shared with the
> hypervisor and is no longer reusable for pKVM. So kvm_share_hyp() now
> rolls back on failure, and the unshare WARN_ON()s are left non-fatal
> and documented rather than promoted to BUG_ON(). The system keeps
> running, and only later pKVM reuse of a leaked page would fail. We do
> not expect any of these paths to trigger in practice.
>
> Severity is low and this can wait for 7.2. Patch 3 builds on patch 2,
> otherwise they are independent.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - New patch 3: roll back partial shares in kvm_share_hyp(); document
> the deliberate leak-on-WARN in kvm_unshare_hyp() (Vincent, Marc).
> - Patches 1 and 2 functionally unchanged (patch 2 gains the call-site
> comment).
> - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260529074341.2271950-1-tabba@google.com/
>
> Cheers,
> /fuad
For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
>
> Fuad Tabba (3):
> KVM: arm64: Free hyp-share tracking node when share hypercall fails
> KVM: arm64: Avoid host/hyp share desync on unshare hypercall failure
> KVM: arm64: Roll back partial shares on kvm_share_hyp() failure
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.54.0.929.g9b7fa37559-goog
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 12:17 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: arm64: Fix host/hyp tracking on share/unshare hypercall failure tabba
2026-05-29 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: Free hyp-share tracking node when share hypercall fails tabba
2026-05-29 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: arm64: Avoid host/hyp share desync on unshare hypercall failure tabba
2026-05-29 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: arm64: Roll back partial shares on kvm_share_hyp() failure tabba
2026-06-03 10:12 ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ah_99d29qLuQey35@google.com \
--to=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox