From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73240CD5BC9 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 10:32:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=CUY3wO3AXoTGpLJpP08Nie3HTtt2sZoLXbNAigBBj80=; b=ZNhKwaieQ4m4dcftYkAbm3uW0l PZ6a5+1gwEq0IVeyHscpPWpGaH9mfGCKbQaBZZ2i9spMXHQf7V9V7wuwbnMaTyDUSKIijmvXl3wtF QHN5oIPRXoyIJMXyvTFkR9n/+bQrJab0o2T/EYc4C9NuHU+GxOfD6Bv38nSVDjbhWXiULPM25csCd IiQAm/d5dwgVE8f01XErJLuhA1vvtg0pll5OaJjJzEsqCup6GRkzaaaccsE0OA8NCWdQLkni73Zdk RATkQFWCNk8yuRZjfLTas8xOf8fJUFzUUQupHX6gx5defw1EV/MAyeW37MIhZ3dOJxvYGEBFr54Ir vCkfqBOQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wSBZC-00000003v53-2Tl3; Wed, 27 May 2026 10:32:50 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wSBZ9-00000003v2K-3vST for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 May 2026 10:32:49 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B751595; Wed, 27 May 2026 03:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from J2N7QTR9R3 (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98CEB3F7D8; Wed, 27 May 2026 03:32:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1779877965; bh=0st74ItZiJDJHY//YKi9k3j5LAz4Sxki0o7s6Hb9c5s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JLiGXkxk0Fgkp4N/V0D32PUPj34yCyi7teBulpO88R+mFWUqu6IeJUKwO8I6RMgg4 olOb0D10ygJCmOyRBDlt+6nGQU+prgNtRjpdkLDBhFs6V8bLFC9fCYZgLfnMB+9i9m 2NLTXZ/Cy1rh7UFF1i8yww+vOhjVDTJYgVz5b/kA= Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 11:32:37 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Marc Zyngier , will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, broonie@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, oupton@kernel.org, tabba@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] arm64+KVM: FPSIMD/SVE/SME cleanups Message-ID: References: <20260521132556.584676-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <86se7duvgc.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86se7duvgc.wl-maz@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260527_033248_014229_79090B43 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.43 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 09:07:31AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2026 14:25:38 +0100, > Mark Rutland wrote: > > This series cleans up low-level FPSIMD/SVE/SME state management code, > > making it easier to maintain and extend (e.g. adding SME support to > > KVM), and enabling better debugging (e.g. by making SVE/SME save/restore > > visible to KASAN and KCSAN). > > > > This is purely cleanup, there are NO bugs addressed by this series. > > I had a look throughout, and couldn't see anything untoward other than > the couple of nits that were already pointed out. Killing the horrible > asm macros definitely brings a bit of fresh air to this code base. > > Given the sensitivity of the change, I'd like this to simmer in -next > for a bit. How do you want this to be merged? I'm happy to take the > whole thing in kvmarm, and share the branch with arm64. That works for me. Catalin, Will, any preference? > I assume you'll post a v2 anyway? Yep; given the bits that need fixups, I'll send a v2 by the end of this week unless something explodes. Mark.