From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@amd.com>
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@nxp.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
magnus.damm@gmail.com, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com, daniel.baluta@nxp.com,
tanmay.shah@amd.com, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] remoteproc: switch drivers to optional resource-table helper
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 11:44:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahctlW_4AKS6IHYt@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514162129.1504162-6-ben.levinsky@amd.com>
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 09:21:29AM -0700, Ben Levinsky wrote:
> Use the shared optional resource-table helper in the remoteproc
> drivers that already treat a missing resource table as non-fatal:
> xlnx_r5_remoteproc, rcar_rproc, stm32_rproc, imx_rproc, and
> imx_dsp_rproc.
>
> Keep thin local parse_fw() wrappers in each driver so the helper only
> centralizes the return-value handling. That lets each platform retain
> control over whether the missing-table case is logged and at what
> severity, while other parsing failures continue to propagate to the
> caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 24 ++++++++++-----
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 25 ++++++++-------
> drivers/remoteproc/rcar_rproc.c | 25 ++++++++-------
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 23 +++++++++-----
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 41 +++++++++----------------
> 5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index 2d9f14fbef1d..2ff74f7938f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -954,14 +954,6 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct fir
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int imx_dsp_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> -{
> - if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
> - dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
Why is this getting moved after imx_dsp_rproc_load()?
> static int imx_dsp_rproc_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> @@ -990,6 +982,22 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int imx_dsp_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc,
> + const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table_optional(rproc, fw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!rproc->table_ptr)
> + dev_warn(&rproc->dev,
> + "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
I am not overly fond of having to check rproc->table_ptr for the printout. How
about:
#define rproc_elf_load_rsc_table_optional(rproc, fw, dev_func, fmt, ...) \
({ \
int ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw); \
if (ret == -EINVAL) { \
dev_func(&rproc->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
return 0; \
} else { \
return ret; \
} \
})
in remoteproc_internal.h and something like:
static int imx_dsp_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc,
const struct firmware *fw)
{
rproc_elf_load_rsc_table_optional(rproc, fw, dev_warn,
"no resource table found for this firmware\n");
}
in the clients?
> static const struct rproc_ops imx_dsp_rproc_ops = {
> .prepare = imx_dsp_rproc_prepare,
> .unprepare = imx_dsp_rproc_unprepare,
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 6249815b54d8..58c63f97ebf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -680,17 +680,6 @@ static int imx_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int imx_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_info(&rproc->dev, "No resource table in elf\n");
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> {
> struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> @@ -768,6 +757,20 @@ imx_rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *
> return rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> }
>
> +static int imx_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table_optional(rproc, fw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!rproc->table_ptr)
> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "No resource table in elf\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
> .prepare = imx_rproc_prepare,
> .attach = imx_rproc_attach,
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/rcar_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/rcar_rproc.c
> index e3121fadd292..b7a39014b6bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/rcar_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/rcar_rproc.c
> @@ -55,17 +55,6 @@ static int rcar_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> }
> }
>
> -static int rcar_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_info(&rproc->dev, "No resource table in elf\n");
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int rcar_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct rcar_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> @@ -99,6 +88,20 @@ static int rcar_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int rcar_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table_optional(rproc, fw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!rproc->table_ptr)
> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "No resource table in elf\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct rproc_ops rcar_rproc_ops = {
> .prepare = rcar_rproc_prepare,
> .start = rcar_rproc_start,
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 7ac8265b60ac..a4d42b755c74 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -232,14 +232,6 @@ static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> }
> }
>
> -static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> -{
> - if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
> - dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static irqreturn_t stm32_rproc_wdg(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = data;
> @@ -623,6 +615,21 @@ stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz)
> return (__force struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
> }
>
> +static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table_optional(rproc, fw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!rproc->table_ptr)
> + dev_warn(&rproc->dev,
> + "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
> .prepare = stm32_rproc_prepare,
> .start = stm32_rproc_start,
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> index e5d1903c9636..9b9f07d152e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -664,33 +664,6 @@ static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
> - * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
> - * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
> - *
> - * get resource table if available
> - *
> - * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
> - */
> -static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> - if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> - /*
> - * resource table only required for IPC.
> - * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
> - * for example, loading r5 hello world application
> - * so simply inform user and keep going.
> - */
> - dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
> - ret = 0;
> - }
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare() - prepare core to boot/attach
> * adds carveouts for TCM bank and reserved memory regions
> @@ -843,6 +816,20 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table_optional(rproc, fw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!rproc->table_ptr)
> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
> .prepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare,
> .unprepare = zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 16:21 [PATCH v2 0/5] remoteproc: cleanup shared carveout and resource-table helpers Ben Levinsky
2026-05-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] remoteproc: add common wc-ioremap carveout callbacks Ben Levinsky
2026-05-27 14:51 ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-05-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] remoteproc: switch exact-match drivers to wc-ioremap callbacks Ben Levinsky
2026-05-27 14:52 ` Mathieu Poirier
2026-05-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: mark wc-ioremap carveouts as iomem Ben Levinsky
2026-05-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] remoteproc: add helper for optional ELF resource tables Ben Levinsky
2026-05-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] remoteproc: switch drivers to optional resource-table helper Ben Levinsky
2026-05-27 17:44 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahctlW_4AKS6IHYt@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=ben.levinsky@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox