From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3BD8CD6E44 for ; Thu, 28 May 2026 13:43:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=xB83MMQJtgx4blW20grTGAuXYxlz2Qs+h6trlIglCbE=; b=T66dEuRWnCP1KZRSHaCiFfZjoy 9IjdMBrT9AaXzIqZ/qnHBAXqA7SHqAPJbZ6PynUZpSuF6xDbjtUwkYDCev68OHtx63F1L27ND+5A3 4Tv8/eung0w+sX1jjdXBw/mjzZFmPeAuIAxP6kB+1WlLK7Un9Q1QAxeLAaRwa0dczERdvqZF69kAt 8RSw56+GLBZIcx+/VVrsUKdCVp0X0ugp+22PF9T1q+A3QKG0ViVCZOtXljGU48FrB64XHyxGPgSxH KCUNkVDnOFqMOMHntayqij6EOv0wKTDGGZuTYBb26AFHg5H5zZ7osjLeX4HkSHO0JZQLPJxM6cY4f YzUkcj1g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wSb0g-00000005niN-29fE; Thu, 28 May 2026 13:42:54 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wSb0d-00000005nhU-37Vr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 28 May 2026 13:42:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F9444714; Thu, 28 May 2026 13:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A28D1F000E9; Thu, 28 May 2026 13:42:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779975770; bh=xB83MMQJtgx4blW20grTGAuXYxlz2Qs+h6trlIglCbE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jWvZy6tTmXv4uK2QplcSaUgWUJIz92z+wKhi/zAmihpjBB2KWHqGf0DEnVSVk86uq r5QWeFDoBUFGX134RmM8ZrZqzSq5O+xqC3oSwjHcwiCuGknN2M2Ei+7GuQmYezX51O ZMbnL31fhJM+I5/7JGBFWMA4I1wTvooBYYUBPOCJyY1ftNzU5p8Aw8ndPOKE8P9h9F HrxVYcEdsWly+3Os4Az8KFMGTTmMylXV+WAUPWh/f2IZy0YC/DptI4AjBY/wmRpYb7 j7glSISlhcmTvsI3G0e2JzzFARtcEgq80GfqjV3Ln1BI/NNEkJpbI+S3jhxiSodW1A X9gq3AzK6tBhg== Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:42:45 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Puranjay Mohan Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Yonghong Song , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Song Liu , Xu Kuohai , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64 Message-ID: References: <20260427234801.2104511-1-puranjay@kernel.org> <20260427234801.2104511-4-puranjay@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260427234801.2104511-4-puranjay@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260528_064251_805435_42B119AC X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.88 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 04:48:00PM -0700, Puranjay Mohan wrote: > Now that arm64 supports stack arguments, enable the existing stack_arg, > stack_arg_kfunc and verifier_stack_arg tests for __TARGET_ARCH_arm64. > > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__stack_arg_precision.c | 3 ++- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg.c | 3 ++- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg_kfunc.c | 3 ++- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stack_arg_precision.c | 3 ++- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_stack_arg.c | 3 ++- > 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Do any of these tests pass more than eight parameters? If not, then they're not touching any of the stack stuff you added for arm64. Will