From: "Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
To: Sven Peter <sven@kernel.org>, Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>,
Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Cc: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>,
asahi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_bcm4377: Use named initializers for pci_device_id array
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:59:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aimXkX4FC4JVxt6q@monoceros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260504160940.2168650-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1473 bytes --]
On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 06:09:40PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote:
> Initializing a struct using list initializers is hard to read, compared
> to that using named initializers is more ideomatic. Convert the macro
> used to assign values in the driver's pci_device_id array accordingly.
>
> This change doesn't introduce any changes to the compiled array on an
> x86 and an arm64 build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> this is a preparing change for making struct pci_device_id::driver_data an
> anonymous union (similar to
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1776579304.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com/).
> This requires named initializers for .driver_data. But even without that
> this is a nice cleanup making the macro better readable.
>
> Gcc is happy with simplifying the assignment further using
> PCI_VDEVICE(BROADCOM, BCM ## id ## _DEVICE_ID), but this is a bit fishy
> because PCI_VDEVICE also assigns .class and .class_mask (using list
> initializers), so I didn't convert that.
In the meantime I learned that doing that would break W=1 builds, so it
was a good choice to not go that path.
> Once all pci_device_id use
> named initializers, the two zeros can be dropped from PCI_VDEVICE and
> this entry simplified accordingly.
Is this patch still on someone's radar? Ideally for application in time
for 7.2-rc1?
Best regards
Uwe
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-04 16:09 [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_bcm4377: Use named initializers for pci_device_id array Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
2026-06-10 16:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) [this message]
2026-06-10 17:13 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2026-06-10 21:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aimXkX4FC4JVxt6q@monoceros \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
--cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=j@jannau.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=msp@baylibre.com \
--cc=neal@gompa.dev \
--cc=sven@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox