From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: "Wayen.Yan" <win847@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: airoha: Fix debugfs new-tuple display for IPv4 ROUTE entries
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:31:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aivgB2sduxGr8Do8@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a2b40ea.4dd82583.3a5c46.e5a2@mx.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1971 bytes --]
> In airoha_ppe_debugfs_foe_show(), the second switch statement falls
> through from PPE_PKT_TYPE_IPV4_HNAPT/DSLITE to PPE_PKT_TYPE_IPV4_ROUTE,
> accessing hwe->ipv4.new_tuple for all three types. However, IPv4 ROUTE
> (3-tuple) entries do not contain a valid new_tuple — this field is only
> meaningful for NATted flows (HNAPT/DSLITE). For ROUTE entries, the
> memory at the new_tuple offset holds routing information, not NAT data,
> so displaying "new=" produces garbage output.
>
> Split the fallthrough: display new_tuple only for HNAPT and DSLITE, and
> add an explicit empty case for IPV4_ROUTE.
>
> Fixes: 3fe15c640f38 ("net: airoha: Introduce PPE debugfs support")
> Signed-off-by: Wayen.Yan <win847@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_ppe_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_ppe_debugfs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_ppe_debugfs.c
> index 0112c41..f9c12e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_ppe_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_ppe_debugfs.c
> @@ -121,8 +121,6 @@ static int airoha_ppe_debugfs_foe_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private,
> case PPE_PKT_TYPE_IPV4_DSLITE:
> src_port = &hwe->ipv4.new_tuple.src_port;
> dest_port = &hwe->ipv4.new_tuple.dest_port;
> - fallthrough;
> - case PPE_PKT_TYPE_IPV4_ROUTE:
> src_addr = &hwe->ipv4.new_tuple.src_ip;
> dest_addr = &hwe->ipv4.new_tuple.dest_ip;
> seq_puts(m, " new=");
> @@ -130,6 +128,8 @@ static int airoha_ppe_debugfs_foe_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private,
> src_port, dest_port,
> ipv6);
> break;
> + case PPE_PKT_TYPE_IPV4_ROUTE:
I guess you can just drop PPE_PKT_TYPE_IPV4_ROUTE and use the default case.
Fixing it:
Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 23:09 [PATCH] net: airoha: Fix debugfs new-tuple display for IPv4 ROUTE entries Wayen.Yan
2026-06-12 10:31 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aivgB2sduxGr8Do8@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=win847@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox