From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: ziniu.wang_1@oss.nxp.com
Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulfh@kernel.org, haibo.chen@nxp.com,
Frank.Li@nxp.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, s32@nxp.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable irq during suspend to fix unhandled interrupt
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:37:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aj1ZWZo_9MLUWDBD@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625105934.2890635-5-ziniu.wang_1@oss.nxp.com>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 06:59:33PM +0800, ziniu.wang_1@oss.nxp.com wrote:
> From: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>
>
> When using WIFI out-of-band wakeup, an "irq xxx: nobody cared" warning
> occurs. This happens because the usdhc interrupt is not disabled during
> system suspend when device_may_wakeup() returns false.
>
> The sequence of events leading to this issue:
> 1. System enters suspend without disabling usdhc interrupt
> (because device_may_wakeup() returns false for usdhc device)
> 2. WIFI out-of-band wakeup triggers system resume via GPIO interrupt
> 3. WIFI sends a Card interrupt before usdhc has fully resumed
> 4. usdhc is still in runtime suspend state and cannot handle the
> interrupt properly
> 5. The unhandled interrupt triggers "nobody cared" warning
>
> Fix this by unconditionally disabling the usdhc interrupt during suspend
> and re-enabling it during resume, regardless of the wakeup capability.
> This ensures no interrupts are processed during the suspend/resume
> transition.
Does it impact the case if WIFI don't use out-of-band wakeup?
Frank
>
> Fixes: 676a83855614 ("mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: refactor the system PM logic")
> Signed-off-by: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 7fcaecdd4ec6..c4a22e42628e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -2076,9 +2076,10 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> if (mmc_card_keep_power(host->mmc) && esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data))
> sdhc_esdhc_tuning_save(host);
>
> + /* The irqs of imx are not shared. It is safe to disable */
> + disable_irq(host->irq);
> +
> if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> - /* The irqs of imx are not shared. It is safe to disable */
> - disable_irq(host->irq);
> ret = sdhci_enable_irq_wakeups(host);
> if (!ret)
> dev_warn(dev, "Failed to enable irq wakeup\n");
> @@ -2129,10 +2130,10 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_resume(struct device *dev)
> /* re-initialize hw state in case it's lost in low power mode */
> sdhci_esdhc_imx_hwinit(host);
>
> - if (host->irq_wake_enabled) {
> + if (host->irq_wake_enabled)
> sdhci_disable_irq_wakeups(host);
> - enable_irq(host->irq);
> - }
> +
> + enable_irq(host->irq);
>
> /*
> * restore the saved tuning delay value for the device which keep
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 10:59 [PATCH v2 0/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix SDIO suspend/resume issues ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: remove unnecessary mmc_card_wake_sdio_irq check for tuning save/restore ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 16:26 ` Frank Li
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: restore DLL override for DDR modes on resume ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 16:29 ` Frank Li
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: restore pinctrl before restoring ios timing " ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 16:35 ` Frank Li
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable irq during suspend to fix unhandled interrupt ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 16:37 ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix suspend/resume error handling ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 16:39 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aj1ZWZo_9MLUWDBD@SMW015318 \
--to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s32@nxp.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
--cc=ziniu.wang_1@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox