From: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yuanbin Xie <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>,
Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: mm: fix use-after-free in __do_user_fault() under CONFIG_DEBUG_USER
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:44:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aj5KCj1cRX3_IpPN@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626073048.3595106-2-xiqi2@huawei.com>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 03:30:47PM +0800, Qi Xi wrote:
> When CONFIG_DEBUG_USER is enabled with user_debug=31 on 32-bit ARM,
> a user page fault triggers show_pte() via __do_user_fault() after
> do_page_fault() has already released mmap_read_lock. If another
> thread concurrently calls munmap(), the page table pages can be
> freed while show_pte() is still reading them, causing a
> use-after-free in show_pte().
>
> The race can be reproduced on multi_v7_defconfig with:
> CONFIG_DEBUG_USER=y
> CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y
> kernel command line: user_debug=31
>
> A delay inserted in show_pte() for testing widens the race window and
> makes the UAF reliably reproducible. On LPAE, the race works as
> follows:
>
> CPU 0 (fault path) CPU 1 (munmap)
> munmap(page 0) -> clears PTE[0]
> PTE/PMD pages remain
>
> read page 0 -> page fault
> -> do_DataAbort()
> -> do_page_fault()
> -> lock_mm_and_find_vma() -> no VMA
> (mmap_read_lock released)
> -> __do_user_fault()
> -> show_pte(tsk->mm, addr)
> -> *pgd (valid)
> -> p4d/pud checks pass
>
> -> [delay] munmap(page 1)
> -> clears PTE[1]
> -> PTE/PMD pages freed
> -> PGD cleared
>
> -> pmd_offset(pud, addr)
> -> *pud=0 -> __va(0)
> -> dereference
> -> secondary data abort (kernel)
>
> Fix by taking mmap_read_lock() around show_pte() in __do_user_fault().
> __do_user_fault() is called from process context with interrupts
> enabled, so the context can sleep and mmap_read_lock() is safe here.
This is a fault path which should only be called when something is
already wrong, the mm lock may already be held (e.g. a kernel
fault while already holding the mmap lock.) We can't take any locks
here.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 7:30 [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: mm: fix use-after-free in show_pte() Qi Xi
2026-06-26 7:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: mm: fix use-after-free in __do_user_fault() under CONFIG_DEBUG_USER Qi Xi
2026-06-26 9:44 ` Russell King [this message]
2026-06-26 7:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: mm: protect show_pte() in do_DataAbort() fallback path Qi Xi
2026-06-26 9:45 ` Russell King
2026-06-26 10:16 ` Xie Yuanbin
2026-06-26 12:37 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aj5KCj1cRX3_IpPN@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=xieyuanbin1@huawei.com \
--cc=xiqi2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox