Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Sync SPSR_EL1 when injecting an exception into a pVM
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:41:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajAPNFDsQ63k_jAS@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EHjTyMOoCLQ7d6+TgkrnOJF-PV9K-BKtb4CNuAg8p4gtg6wg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 11:52:10AM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 11:05, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 12:34:14PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > > When pKVM injects a synchronous exception into a protected guest, it
> > > re-enters without restoring the guest's EL1 sysregs and writes the EL1
> > > exception registers to hardware by hand: ESR_EL1 and ELR_EL1, but not
> > > SPSR_EL1. enter_exception64() sets SPSR_EL1 (the interrupted PSTATE)
> > > only in memory, so the guest's handler reads a stale SPSR_EL1 and
> > > restores the wrong PSTATE on eret.
> > >
> > > Write SPSR_EL1 alongside the other exception registers.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 6c30bfb18d0b ("KVM: arm64: Add handlers for protected VM System Registers")
> > > Reported-by: sashiko <sashiko@sashiko.dev>
> > > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> > > index 8c3fbb413a06..1a7d5cd16d72 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> > > @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static void inject_sync64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 esr)
> > >
> > >       write_sysreg_el1(esr, SYS_ESR);
> > >       write_sysreg_el1(read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR), SYS_ELR);
> > > +     write_sysreg_el1(read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR), SYS_SPSR);
> > >       write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
> > >       write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), SYS_SPSR);
> > >  }
> >
> > Is SPSR_EL1 not set in enter_exception64() using vcpu_cpsr(vcpu), which
> > *is* set here? I'm just a bit wary of the report, as I'd have expected
> > fireworks if we weren't initialising the guest's SPSR on the exception
> > injection path.
> 
> Yes, enter_exception64() sets SPSR_EL1, but only in memory:
> __vcpu_write_spsr() takes the nVHE path and calls
> __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL1, val), which writes
> vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[SPSR_EL1] without touching the hardware
> register.
> 
> In the normal nVHE entry path that memory value reaches hardware via
> __sysreg_restore_state_nvhe() before __guest_enter(). But
> inject_sync64() runs inside the fixup_guest_exit() loop, which
> re-enters the guest directly without a sysreg restore pass. ESR_EL1
> and ELR_EL1 are already written to hardware by hand for this reason
> but SPSR_EL1 was missed.

Ah, I see. Does that mean that all the in-memory updates performed by
enter_exception64() (e.g. the construction of the cpsr) are ignored too?

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 11:34 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Sync SPSR_EL1 when injecting an exception into a pVM Fuad Tabba
2026-06-15 10:05 ` Will Deacon
2026-06-15 10:52   ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-15 14:41     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-06-15 15:03       ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-15 15:10         ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajAPNFDsQ63k_jAS@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox