Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: William Theesfeld <william@theesfeld.net>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: zynq: handle kasprintf() failure in periph_clk registration
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 12:07:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajAjT2oiAjFPJ2Bb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601203500.658135-1-william@theesfeld.net>

On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 04:35:00PM -0400, William Theesfeld wrote:
> zynq_clk_register_periph_clk() ignores the return value of the two
> kasprintf() calls used to build the mux and divider clock names, and
> passes the resulting (possibly NULL) pointers straight into
> clk_register_mux(), clk_register_divider() and clk_register_gate() as
> the clock '"'name'"' argument.  On allocation failure that name later
> gets dereferenced by the clock framework (e.g. in debugfs name
> formatting), causing a NULL-pointer dereference.
> 
> Check both kasprintf() returns.  On failure unwind any allocated name
> buffer and the spinlock, then fall through to the existing err label
> which sets clks[] to ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM).  Freeing the spinlock on the
> error path is correct here because no clk_register_*() call has had
> a chance to take ownership of it; the success path intentionally
> hands it off to the registered clocks.
> 
> The neighbouring zynq_clk_register_fclk() in the same file already
> uses this per-allocation goto-label cleanup pattern; this change
> brings periph_clk into line with it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William Theesfeld <william@theesfeld.net>

Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-01 20:35 [PATCH] clk: zynq: handle kasprintf() failure in periph_clk registration William Theesfeld
2026-06-02 12:40 ` Michal Simek
2026-06-15 16:07 ` Brian Masney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajAjT2oiAjFPJ2Bb@redhat.com \
    --to=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=william@theesfeld.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox