From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
Cc: michal.simek@amd.com, andersson@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: xlnx: refactor start & stop ops
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 11:21:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajrAj2qfjvogDDrP@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260619163854.410392-1-tanmay.shah@amd.com>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 09:38:54AM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> Current _start and _stop ops are implemented using various APIs from the
> platform management firmware driver. Instead provide respective RPU
> start and stop API in the firmware driver and move the logic to interact
> with the PM firmware in the firmware driver. The remoteproc driver doesn't
> need to know actual logic, but only the final result i.e. RPU start/stop
> was success or not. This refactor keeps the remoteproc driver simple and
> moves firmware interaction logic to the firmware driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 68 ++----------------
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h | 12 ++++
> 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> index af838b2dc327..f9a3a95b0638 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> @@ -1513,6 +1513,99 @@ int zynqmp_pm_request_wake(const u32 node,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zynqmp_pm_request_wake);
>
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_pm_start_rpu - Boot Real-time Processing Unit (Cortex-R) on SoC
> + *
> + * @node: power-domains id of the core
> + * @bootaddr: Boot address of elf
> + *
> + * Return: status, either success or error+reason
> + */
> +int zynqmp_pm_start_rpu(const u32 node, const u64 bootaddr)
> +{
> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of
> + * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector
> + * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte
> + * boundaries.
> + *
> + * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or
> + * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory)
> + *
> + * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC.
> + *
> + * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector.
> + * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency
> + * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor
> + * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the
> + * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM.
> + */
> + bootmem = (bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
> +
> + pr_debug("RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", bootaddr,
> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
> +
> + /* Request node before starting RPU core if new version of API is supported */
> + if (zynqmp_pm_feature(PM_REQUEST_NODE) > PM_API_VERSION_1) {
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(node,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("failed to request 0x%x", node);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(node, true,
> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", node);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zynqmp_pm_start_rpu);
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_pm_stop_rpu - Stop Real-time Processing Unit (Cortex-R) on SoC
> + *
> + * @node: power-domains id of the core
> + *
> + * Return: status, either success or error+reason
> + */
> +int zynqmp_pm_stop_rpu(const u32 node)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Use release node API to stop core if new version of API is supported */
> + if (zynqmp_pm_feature(PM_RELEASE_NODE) > PM_API_VERSION_1) {
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node(node);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Check expected version of EEMI call before calling it. This avoids
> + * any error or warning prints from firmware as it is expected that fw
> + * doesn't support it.
> + */
> + if (zynqmp_pm_feature(PM_FORCE_POWERDOWN) != PM_API_VERSION_1) {
> + pr_debug("EEMI interface %d ver 1 not supported\n",
> + PM_FORCE_POWERDOWN);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + /* maintain force pwr down for backward compatibility */
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(node, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("core force power down failed\n");
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zynqmp_pm_stop_rpu);
> +
> /**
> * zynqmp_pm_set_requirement() - PM call to set requirement for PM slaves
> * @node: Node ID of the slave
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> index 3349d1877751..dcd8a93f031c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -364,49 +364,12 @@ static void zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
> - enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
> int ret;
>
> - /*
> - * The exception vector pointers (EVP) refer to the base-address of
> - * exception vectors (for reset, IRQ, FIQ, etc). The reset-vector
> - * starts at the base-address and subsequent vectors are on 4-byte
> - * boundaries.
> - *
> - * Exception vectors can start either from 0x0000_0000 (LOVEC) or
> - * from 0xFFFF_0000 (HIVEC) which is mapped in the OCM (On-Chip Memory)
> - *
> - * Usually firmware will put Exception vectors at LOVEC.
> - *
> - * It is not recommend that you change the exception vector.
> - * Changing the EVP to HIVEC will result in increased interrupt latency
> - * and jitter. Also, if the OCM is secured and the Cortex-R5F processor
> - * is non-secured, then the Cortex-R5F processor cannot access the
> - * HIVEC exception vectors in the OCM.
> - */
> - bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
> - PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
> -
> - dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
> - bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
> -
> - /* Request node before starting RPU core if new version of API is supported */
> - if (zynqmp_pm_feature(PM_REQUEST_NODE) > 1) {
> - ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
> - ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> - ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to request 0x%x",
> - r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
> - bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_start_rpu(r5_core->pm_domain_id, rproc->bootaddr);
> if (ret)
> - dev_err(r5_core->dev,
> - "failed to start RPU = 0x%x\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to start RPU\n");
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -423,30 +386,9 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
> int ret;
>
> - /* Use release node API to stop core if new version of API is supported */
> - if (zynqmp_pm_feature(PM_RELEASE_NODE) > 1) {
> - ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node(r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Check expected version of EEMI call before calling it. This avoids
> - * any error or warning prints from firmware as it is expected that fw
> - * doesn't support it.
> - */
> - if (zynqmp_pm_feature(PM_FORCE_POWERDOWN) != 1) {
> - dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "EEMI interface %d ver 1 not supported\n",
> - PM_FORCE_POWERDOWN);
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - }
> -
> - /* maintain force pwr down for backward compatibility */
> - ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
> - ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> + ret = zynqmp_pm_stop_rpu(r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> if (ret)
> - dev_err(r5_core->dev, "core force power down failed\n");
> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to stop RPU\n");
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h b/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> index 7e27b0f7bf7e..347df66ee176 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> @@ -644,6 +644,8 @@ int zynqmp_pm_get_node_status(const u32 node, u32 *const status,
> u32 *const requirements, u32 *const usage);
> int zynqmp_pm_get_rpu_node_status(const u32 node, u32 *const status,
> u32 *const requirements, u32 *const usage);
> +int zynqmp_pm_start_rpu(const u32 node, const u64 bootaddr);
> +int zynqmp_pm_stop_rpu(const u32 node);
> int zynqmp_pm_set_sd_config(u32 node, enum pm_sd_config_type config, u32 value);
> int zynqmp_pm_set_gem_config(u32 node, enum pm_gem_config_type config,
> u32 value);
> @@ -960,6 +962,16 @@ static inline int zynqmp_pm_get_rpu_node_status(const u32 node, u32 *const statu
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> +static inline int zynqmp_pm_start_rpu(const u32 node, const u64 bootaddr)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int zynqmp_pm_stop_rpu(const u32 node)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> static inline int zynqmp_pm_set_sd_config(u32 node,
> enum pm_sd_config_type config,
> u32 value)
>
> base-commit: 721396afea31eac476d88f5db10ba111ba4b8382
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 16:38 [PATCH] remoteproc: xlnx: refactor start & stop ops Tanmay Shah
2026-06-22 12:25 ` Michal Simek
2026-06-22 22:29 ` Shah, Tanmay
2026-06-23 17:21 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajrAj2qfjvogDDrP@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox