Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Sort registers in cpu-feature-registers.rst
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:22:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akaCJvZkdqigcQUZ@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522-arm64-cpu-ftr-regs-v1-3-19775b40faf0@kernel.org>

On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 06:58:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> -  ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 - Processor Feature Register 0
> +  ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 - Instruction set attribute register 1
>  
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
>       | Name                         |  bits   | visible |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | DIT                          | [51-48] |    y    |
> +     | LS64                         | [63-60] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | MPAM                         | [43-40] |    n    |
> +     | I8MM                         | [55-52] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | SVE                          | [35-32] |    y    |
> +     | DGH                          | [51-48] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | GIC                          | [27-24] |    n    |
> +     | BF16                         | [47-44] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | AdvSIMD                      | [23-20] |    y    |
> +     | SB                           | [39-36] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | FP                           | [19-16] |    y    |
> +     | FRINTTS                      | [35-32] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | EL3                          | [15-12] |    n    |
> +     | GPI                          | [31-28] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | EL2                          | [11-8]  |    n    |
> +     | GPA                          | [27-24] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | EL1                          | [7-4]   |    n    |
> +     | LRCPC                        | [23-20] |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> -     | EL0                          | [3-0]   |    n    |
> +     | FCMA                         | [19-16] |    y    |
> +     +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> +     | JSCVT                        | [15-12] |    y    |
> +     +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> +     | API                          | [11-8]  |    y    |
> +     +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> +     | APA                          | [7-4]   |    y    |
> +     +------------------------------+---------+---------+
> +     | DPB                          | [3-0]   |    y    |
>       +------------------------------+---------+---------+

The patch is fine but I just realised that we are really inconsistent
with the non-visible things. We exposed a few hear, I guess in the early
days, and then we stopped, just adding the occasional visible fields.

Shall we drop the 'visible' column altogether and only document the
visible fields here?

-- 
Catalin


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-02 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-22 17:58 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: Fixes and cleanups for cpu-feature-registers.rst Mark Brown
2026-05-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: Don't number registers in cpu-feature-registers.rst Mark Brown
2026-05-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Document missing bitfields " Mark Brown
2026-07-02 15:19   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-05-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Sort registers " Mark Brown
2026-07-02 15:22   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2026-07-02 15:38     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akaCJvZkdqigcQUZ@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox