From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07926C43602 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 03:17:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NJCYJ5lPzZyw2ZWDsMaM8ivbRJQBwho/DhuM9uW3bb8=; b=MyRDbokIauYPgOtFpGJUvXYGx3 b1Vnr0cSBmMEqvMzVv0PsOC4NmQl/oMkUsphtPxc9XgO5ocmVojVil5GeInWcjX60Cn+vFlxd2/XC 4vnAEbQLdtS1CFfgbSkzk86RZTAWZlqlg3QH437XD+vEId5kD2/ttR2AhstPj4NpmKvmOT9DXujmi rLjelOPa6Np6UpE4+aKyPQiDsdsLYPSd1NUZ6t1wljl9sXXgdLf9GjvEh1jSKkHdmlTYjgvaT20y7 DkWbmzmgGrHonQf0Z4oOnKOVr0rOnJl6BTP75Yj0nM4rwI6W34yokD4k27OOuUFCrhtvZPUTrOtPN y0lgpIDw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wfUOm-00000005vSs-3VsT; Fri, 03 Jul 2026 03:17:04 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wfUOj-00000005vST-497Y for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2026 03:17:03 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5FC22D7; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 20:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (a079125.arm.com [10.164.21.37]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20D143F673; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 20:16:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1783048620; bh=Cg0aznQsnZEY39WOStedS01xS6wPMzQEVG0a6FA2YN8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qs0GDApYTLfVXvDzfSjAZVuskgeq+06Bta5NrHcAmg/20svs/bKpzORxAnoExVzcx v6mPdzTeWIxdE69X5fSxmXIxi0b7je3tdR0WVwQURlIRkJGECWC8IUaC6T80nFesCp L0lY5UQnrERxjQ289uDYqq3zN9AXmy/k2g9xKhdM= Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 08:46:57 +0530 From: Linu Cherian To: Suzuki K Poulose Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ryan Roberts , Kevin Brodsky , Anshuman Khandual , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add BBML3 cpu feature Message-ID: References: <20260701094131.677636-1-linu.cherian@arm.com> <830a4d39-c829-4e79-a0ec-5a3633b58aa6@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <830a4d39-c829-4e79-a0ec-5a3633b58aa6@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260702_201702_069357_FE2846E5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.80 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Suzuki, On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 11:11:35AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 01/07/2026 10:41, Linu Cherian wrote: > > Patches 1 and 2 introduces BBML3 cpu feature > > Patches 3, 4 and 5 adds more cpus to the BBML3 support list, > > which dont advertise themselves through the standard > > MMFR2_ID registers. > > > > Linu Cherian (5): > > arm64: cpufeature: Add BBML3 > > arm64: cpufeature: Detect BBML3 based on MMFR2 ID > > > > arm64: cputype: Add Cortex-A520AE definitions > > arm64: cputype: Add C1-Nano definitions > > arm64: cpufeature: Extend bbml3 support list > > If you could move the last 3 patches to the top, would be easier > for people to back port the "enable" BBLM3 for those CPUs, without > the renaming conflicts. > IMHO, if we change the order, "arm64: cpufeature: Extend bbml3 support list" title need to be tweaked and might not go well with this BBML3 support series. Also, backporting issue wouldnt be a problem if the whole series is backported and not just 3 patches in isolation ? Thanks, Linu Cherian.